Optimal day‐ahead demand response contract for congestion management in the deregulated power market considering wind power. Issue 4 (17th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wu, Jiasi; Zhang, Buhan; Jiang, Yazhou
• Is Part Of: IET generation, transmission & distribution. Volume 12:Issue 4(2018)
• Page Start: 917
• Page End: 926
• Publication Date: 2018-01-17
• Subjects: power markets -- wind power plants -- energy management systems -- optimisation -- decision making; optimal day‐ahead demand response contract -- congestion management -- deregulated power market -- wind power -- electricity market -- wind energy -- independent system operators -- demand response -- transmission congestion; Electric power production -- Periodicals; Electric power transmission -- Periodicals; Electric power distribution -- Periodicals; 621.3105
• DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.1063
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-8687

Abstract

Abstract : In the liberalised electricity market, congestion management (CM) with a high penetration of wind energy is a challenging task for Independent System Operators (ISOs). Even though demand response (DR) provides an opportunity to alleviate transmission congestion, strategic selection of aggregated loads to contract with for DR in the day‐ahead economic dispatch is still under‐investigated. To solve this problem, this study proposes a bi‐level optimisation model to determine the optimal DR buses for CM in the day‐ahead market considering the uncertainty of wind power. The upper model serves to compute the available transfer capability (ATC), while the lower model is to calculate the stochastic dynamic optimal power flow. Through converting the stochastic ATC values to a summation of load supply capability of each load node, the loads which will deteriorate transmission congestion if the corresponding demand grows are determined. The corresponding loads with DR are selected as the optimal candidates. Furthermore, this study constructs a two‐stage optimisation model for optimal load dispatch by incorporating both price‐based DR and incentive‐based DR. The result can be used to assist system operators in decision‐making of electricity biddings from DRs for load curtailment and shift in the market clearing. As a result, the difference of peak and valley loads is reduced; ISOs as well as DR participators can both get economic benefits. Simulation results from the PJM 5‐bus training system and the modified IEEE 30‐bus system demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm for DR contracting in CM.