A search for shocked quartz grains in the Allerød‐Younger Dryas boundary layer. (16th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Van Hoesel, Annelies; Hoek, Wim Z.; Pennock, Gillian M.; Kaiser, Knut; Plümper, Oliver; Jankowski, Michal; Hamers, Maartje F.; Schlaak, Norbert; Küster, Mathias; Andronikov, Alexander V.; Drury, Martyn R.
• Is Part Of: Meteoritics & planetary science. Volume 50:Number 3(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 483
• Page End: 498
• Publication Date: 2015-03-16
• Subjects: Meteorites -- Periodicals; Planetology -- Periodicals; 523.4
• DOI: 10.1111/maps.12435
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1086-9379

Abstract

Abstract: The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis suggests that multiple airbursts or extraterrestrial impacts occurring at the end of the Allerød interstadial resulted in the Younger Dryas cold period. So far, no reproducible, diagnostic evidence has, however, been reported. Quartz grains containing planar deformation features (known as shocked quartz grains), are considered a reliable indicator for the occurrence of an extraterrestrial impact when found in a geological setting. Although alleged shocked quartz grains have been reported at a possible Allerød‐Younger Dryas boundary layer in Venezuela, the identification of shocked quartz in this layer is ambiguous. To test whether shocked quartz is indeed present in the proposed impact layer, we investigated the quartz fraction of multiple Allerød‐Younger Dryas boundary layers from Europe and North America, where proposed impact markers have been reported. Grains were analyzed using a combination of light and electron microscopy techniques. All samples contained a variable amount of quartz grains with (sub)planar microstructures, often tectonic deformation lamellae. A total of one quartz grain containing planar deformation features was found in our samples. This shocked quartz grain comes from the Usselo palaeosol at Geldrop Aalsterhut, the Netherlands. Scanning electron microscopy cathodoluminescence imaging and transmission electron microscopy imaging, however, show that the planar deformation features in this grain are healed and thus likely to be older than the Allerød‐Younger Dryas boundary. We suggest that this grain was possibly eroded from an older crater or distal ejecta layer and later redeposited in the European sandbelt. The single shocked quartz grain at this moment thus cannot be used to support the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis.