VBAC or not VBAC? Improvement of performance and outcome indexes with the promotion of care safety. (13th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nasi, G; Parrocchia, S; Mastromatteo, A M; Triggiani, A; Miraglia, B A; Ferrazzani, S; Moscato, U; Metastasio, P; Piscicelli, C; Distefano, F A
• Is Part Of: European journal of public health. Volume 29(2019)Supplement 4
• Publication Date: 2019-11-13
• Subjects: Epidemiology -- Europe -- Periodicals; Public health -- Europe -- Periodicals; 362.109405
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.184
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1101-1262

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In a multidisciplinary approach to Quality Management System and humanization of care, we aimed at evaluating the characteristics that influence the request of women to carry out Vaginal Birth after Cesarean (VBAC). Methods: Skills have been improved, with the use of tests on dummies and case by case assessments. For the psychological-motivational study we have adopted: Informed consent, Semi-structured interview and Big Five Questionnaire. The women were recruited by both Gemelli and Cristo Re Hospital: the women following the counseling decided to undergo a second Caesarean Section (CS) (41, control group) and women who decided to complete a VBAC (22, experimental group). Results: The analysis of the data shows that the women of the VBAC group are in the average between 31-35 years (57%), 80% has an education = or > at the 3rd level and the choice of the VBAC was conditioned by the partner (64%). The women of the control group are in average > 35 years (51%), 60% have a higher average education and the influence on the choice is oriented by the gynecologist/obstetrician (64%). From the personality test a statistically significant difference emerges between the dimensions Energy and Mental Opening. Past experience influences the choice of the next birth: women who are inclined to a second CS considered the previous CS as a positive event (66%) while only 36% in the VBAC group; 64% of this was the recovery of the painful post-surgery and a certain type of difficulty in the care of the child, in breastfeeding, of having suffered from post-partum mood alterations, which is why they chose to undertake a Trial of Labor After Cesarean. Conclusions: The deeper knowledge of women as well as the preparation and safety of the same operators has shown that it is possible to perform a greater number of VBACs, with the sharing, participation and satisfaction of women and the entire team, leading to an improvement in outcomes and performance indexes. Key messages: The promotion of care safety also improves the performance indexes through continuous training to the operators and the study of psychological aspects that lead to the choice to carry out a VBAC. Good Clinical Practice shown that it is possible to perform a greater number of VBACs, with the sharing, participation and satisfaction of women and the entire team.