The utility of a dual-phase, dual-energy CT protocol in patients presenting with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. (1st July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mohammadinejad, Payam; Kwapisz, Lukasz; Fidler, Jeff L; Sheedy, Shannon P; Heiken, Jay P; Khandelwal, Ashish; Wells, Michael L; Froemming, Adam T; Hansel, Stephanie L; Lee, Yong S; Inoue, Akitoshi; Halaweish, Ahmed F; McCollough, Cynthia H; Bruining, David H; Fletcher, Joel G
• Is Part Of: Acta radiologica open. Volume 10:Number 7(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-07-01
• Subjects: Computed tomography angiography -- gastrointestinal hemorrhage -- predictive value of tests -- sensitivity -- specificity; Radiology -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1177/20584601211030658
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2058-4601

Abstract

Background: Due to their easy accessibility, CT scans have been increasingly used for investigation of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Purpose: To estimate the performance of a dual-phase, dual-energy (DE) GI bleed CT protocol in patients with overt GI bleeding in clinical practice and examine the added value of portal phase and DE images. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with GI bleeding underwent a two-phase DE GI bleed CT protocol. Two gastroenterologists established the reference standard. Performance was estimated using clinical CT reports. Three GI radiologists rated confidence in GI bleeding in a subset of 62 examinations, evaluating first mixed kV arterial images, then after examining additional portal venous phase images, and finally after additional DE images (virtual non-contrast and virtual monoenergetic 50 keV images). Results: 52 of 176 patients (29.5%) had GI bleeding by the reference standard. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the CT GI bleed protocol for detecting GI bleeding were 65.4%, 89.5%, 72.3%, and 86.0%, respectively. In patients with GI bleeding, diagnostic confidence of readers increased after adding portal phase images to arterial phase images ( p = 0.002), without additional benefit from dual energy images. In patients without GI bleeding, confidence in luminal extravasation appropriately decreased after adding portal phase, and subsequently DE images ( p = 0.006, p = 0.018). Conclusion: A two-phase DE GI bleed CT protocol had high specificity and negative predictive value in clinical practice. Portal venous phase images improved diagnostic confidence in comparison to arterial phase images alone. Dual-energy images further improved radiologist confidence in the absence of bleeding.