Artificial Intelligence-based tools to control healthcare associated infections: where do we stand. (13th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scardoni, A; Balzarini, F; Cabitza, F; Odone, A
• Is Part Of: European journal of public health. Volume 29(2019)Supplement 4
• Publication Date: 2019-11-13
• Subjects: Epidemiology -- Europe -- Periodicals; Public health -- Europe -- Periodicals; 362.109405
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.090
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1101-1262

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Control of Healthcare associated infections (HAI) is a key public health concern in Europe. Current HAI surveillance systems are based on manual medical records review, vulnerable to misclassification and expensive. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers great potential to public health action and, specifically, to HAI control. Still, scant evidence is available on both its practice and impact. Methods: As part of a broader multidisciplinary project, we conducted a systematic review to retrieve, pool and critically apprize all the available evidence on practice, performance and impact of AI-based HAI control programmes. We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched the Medline and Embase databases for relevant studies. Included studies were stratified by HAI type and outcomes of interest, including all possible performance measures, clinical, organizational and economic outcomes. Results: We screened 2873 records, resulting in 27 papers included in the review. Studies were carried out in 9 countries, the majority in the US (56%), 18.5% in EU countries, 25.9% published in 2018. Two thirds of studies focused on selected types of infections. Study designs were very diverse and performance observed for HAI detection were very heterogeneous, precluding pooled calculation of summary diagnostic accuracy estimates in most instances, but generally higher than non AI-based models. The highest performance outcomes were Specificity and Negative Predictive Value. Overall performance measures of AI algorithms were: sensitivity range 19%-92%, specificity range 64%-96%, accuracy 70.2%-96.1%. Conclusions: Use of AI algorithms for HAI surveillance of HAI has increased reliability compared to traditional surveillance or to automated surveillance models. With ongoing improvements in information technology, implementation of AI models will improve the quality and capacity of surveillance will support hospital HAI surveillance. Key messages: Artificial Intelligence (AI) offer great potential to healthcare associated infections (HAI) control. Preliminary evidence show AI-based models have perform better than manual or automated models for HAIs detection.