Characteristics of cardiac catheterization laboratory directors at the 2017 U.S. News & World Report top 100 U.S. cardiovascular hospitals. Issue 5 (24th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murugiah, Karthik; Annapureddy, Amarnath R.; Khera, Rohan; Lansky, Alexandra; Curtis, Jeptha P.
• Is Part Of: Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions. Volume 97:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: E624
• Page End: E626
• Publication Date: 2020-08-24
• Subjects: angiography -- coronary -- gender, outcomes/studies -- health care policy; Heart -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Cardiac catheterization -- Periodicals; 616.1207572
• DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29217
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-1946

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) is a focal point for cardiovascular programs and the CCL director represents the key personnel. We outline profiles of CCL directors at the 2017 U.S. News & World Report top 100 U.S. cardiovascular hospitals. Methods: Using hospital websites, LinkedIn, Healthgrades, Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data 2017, and Scopus, we described CCL directors (in 2017) by age, gender, years since medical graduation, international medical school graduate (IMG) status, academic rank, provider clinical focus, and Hirsch ( h )‐index. Results: Nearly all CCL directors were male (97%). The median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 53 (49–61) years and median (IQR) years since medical school graduation was 28 (23–35) years. Over a third of CCL directors (39.4%) were IMGs and 38.4% had completed fellowship training at the same facility where they were CCL director. The median (IQR) h ‐index was 11 (6–22). Of the 69.7% CCL directors who held faculty positions, 60.9% were professors and 30.4% were associate professors. From Medicare data, 45.5% performed only percutaneous coronary interventions, 41.4% performed structural interventions, 3.0% peripheral interventions, and 2.0% performed both structural and peripheral. CCL directors at the top 25 hospitals had higher h ‐indexes, and more likely to have completed fellowship training at their own institution. Conclusions: There are very few women CCL directors at the top U.S. cardiovascular hospitals. A third of the CCL directors were IMGs. A significant proportion of CCL directors primarily performed structural interventions and trained at the same institution, more so at the top 25 hospitals.