Forecasting for intended consequences. Issue 4 (19th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mozelewski, Tina G.; Scheller, Robert M.
• Is Part Of: Conservation science and practice. Volume 3:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-02-19
• Subjects: anthropogenic change -- conservation -- forecasting -- landscape management -- restoration -- simulation modeling; Biodiversity conservation -- Periodicals; Biodiversity conservation; Periodicals; 333.951605
• DOI: 10.1111/csp2.370
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2578-4854

Abstract

Abstract: Restoration and conservation innovations face numerous challenges that often limit widespread adoption, including uncertainty of outcomes, risk averse or status quo biased management, and unknown trade‐offs. These barriers often result in cautious conservation that does not consider the true cost of impeding innovation, and overemphasizes the risks of unintended consequences versus the opportunities presented by proactive and innovative conservation, the intended consequences. Simulation models are powerful tools for forecasting and evaluating the potential outcomes of restoration or conservation innovations prior to on‐the‐ground deployment. These forecasts provide information about the potential trade‐offs among the risks and benefits of candidate management actions, elucidating the likelihood that an innovation will achieve its intended consequences and at what cost. They can also highlight when and where business‐as‐usual management may incur larger costs than alternative management approaches over the long‐term. Forecasts inform the decision‐making process prior to the implementation of emergent, proactive practices at broad scales, lending support for management decisions and reducing the barriers to innovation. Here we review the science, motivations, and challenges of forecasting for restoration and conservation innovations.