Random forest analysis identifies change in serum creatinine and listing status as the most predictive variables of an outcome for young children on liver transplant waitlist. (24th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kulkarni, Sakil; Chi, Lisa; Goss, Charles; Lian, Qinghua; Nadler, Michelle; Stoll, Janis; Doyle, Maria; Turmelle, Yumirle; Khan, Adeel
• Is Part Of: Pediatric transplantation. Volume 25:Number 3(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-24
• Subjects: infant -- liver transplant -- machine learning -- outcome -- pediatric -- random forest analysis -- waitlist; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc. in children -- Periodicals; 617.95408305
• DOI: 10.1111/petr.13932
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1397-3142

Abstract

Abstract: Young children listed for liver transplant have high waitlist mortality (WL), which is not fully predicted by the PELD score. SRTR database was queried for children < 2 years listed for initial LT during 2002‐17 (n = 4973). Subjects were divided into three outcome groups: bad (death or removal for too sick to transplant), good (spontaneous improvement), and transplant. Demographic, clinical, listing history, and laboratory variables at the time of listing (baseline variables), and changes in variables between listing and prior to outcome (trajectory variables) were analyzed using random forest (RF) analysis. 81.5% candidates underwent LT, and 12.3% had bad outcome. RF model including both baseline and trajectory variables improved prediction compared to model using baseline variables alone. RF analyses identified change in serum creatinine and listing status as the most predictive variables. 80% of subjects listed with a PELD score at time of listing and outcome underwent LT, while ~70% of subjects in both bad and good outcome groups were listed with either Status 1 (A or B) prior to an outcome, regardless of initial listing status. Increase in creatinine on LT waitlist was predictive of bad outcome. Longer time spent on WL was predictive of good outcome. Subjects with biliary atresia, liver tumors, and metabolic disease had LT rate >85%, while >20% of subjects with acute liver failure had a bad outcome. Change in creatinine, listing status, need for RRT, time spent on LT waitlist, and diagnoses were the most predictive variables.