Dorsal and ventral mossy cells differ in their axonal projections throughout the dentate gyrus of the mouse hippocampus. Issue 5 (18th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Botterill, Justin J.; Gerencer, Kathleen J.; Vinod, K. Yaragudri; Alcantara‐Gonzalez, David; Scharfman, Helen E.
• Is Part Of: Hippocampus. Volume 31:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 522
• Page End: 539
• Publication Date: 2021-02-18
• Subjects: commissural -- hilus -- molecular layer -- virus -- GABA -- axon -- long‐range; Hippocampus (Brain) -- Periodicals; 612.825
• DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23314
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1050-9631

Abstract

Abstract: Glutamatergic hilar mossy cells (MCs) have axons that terminate both near and far from their cell body but stay within the DG, making synapses primarily in the molecular layer. The long‐range axons are considered the primary projection, and extend throughout the DG ipsilateral to the soma, and project to the contralateral DG. The specificity of MC axons for the inner molecular layer (IML) has been considered to be a key characteristic of the DG. In the present study, we made the surprising finding that dorsal MC axons are an exception to this rule. We used two mouse lines that allow for Cre‐dependent viral labeling of MCs and their axons: dopamine receptor D2 (Drd2‐Cre) and calcitonin receptor‐like receptor (Crlr‐Cre). A single viral injection into the dorsal DG to label dorsal MCs resulted in labeling of MC axons in both the IML and middle molecular layer (MML). Interestingly, this broad termination of dorsal MC axons occurred throughout the septotemporal DG. In contrast, long‐range axons of ventral MCs terminated in the IML, consistent with the literature. Taken together, these results suggest that dorsal and ventral MCs differ significantly in their axonal projections. Since MC projections in the ML are thought to terminate primarily on GCs, the results suggest a dorsal–ventral difference in MC activation of GCs. The surprising difference in dorsal and ventral MC projections should therefore be considered when evaluating dorsal–ventral differences in DG function.