Mental health law assessments: interagency cooperation and practice complexities. (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davidson, Gavin; Fargas, Montserrat; Hamilton, Bernadette; Connaughty, Katie; Harvey, Karen; Lynch, Gerry; McCartan, Delia; McCosker, John; Scott, Jackie
• Is Part Of: Journal of mental health. Volume 30:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 74
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: Mental health law -- compulsory admission -- inter-agency working -- risk -- decision-making; Mental health -- Periodicals; Mental health services -- Periodicals; 362.2
• DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1630721
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0963-8237

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Assessments under mental health law, to determine whether compulsory admission is necessary, tend to be complex, multidisciplinary and inter-agency processes. This article presents the results of a regional audit of assessments under the Mental Health (Northern Ireland) Order 1986. Aims: The aims of the audit were to examine routine practice, identify any issues and so inform how policy and practice may be developed. Method: The audit was designed by an inter-agency advisory group and audit team. Data were collected for a sample of 189 assessments. The sample was weighted to ensure all Health and Social Care Trusts and settings were appropriately represented. Results: These assessments involve high levels of need, risk and complexity. There were no major issues or concerns identified in the majority of assessments. The issues that were identified were mainly due to the difficulties in coordinating professionals and in securing a bed. In 3/189 (2%) of assessments, these issues were identified as contributing to increased distress and risk. Conclusions: The results highlight the complexities of these processes and confirm the need for opportunities, such as joint training and inter-agency interface groups, to further promote cooperation and identify when pressures on resources are increasing risk and distress.