Assessment of pile drivability using random forest regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Wengang; Wu, Chongzhi; Li, Yongqin; Wang, Lin; Samui, P.
• Is Part Of: Georisk. Volume 15:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 27
• Page End: 40
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: Random forest regression -- multivariate adaptive regression splines -- pile drivability -- cross-validation -- Lasso regularisation; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Hazardous geographic environments -- Risk assessment -- Periodicals; Reliability (Engineering) -- Periodicals; Risk management -- Periodicals; 624.151
• DOI: 10.1080/17499518.2019.1674340
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1749-9518

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Driven pile is widely used as an effective and convenient structural component to transfer superstructure loads to deep stiffer soils. Nevertheless, during the design process of piles, due to the intrinsic complexity as well as various design variables, the internal stress state related to pile drivability remains unclear, which makes the analysis imprecise. Thus, the development of an accurate predictive model becomes emergent. This paper presents a practical approach to assess pile drivability in relation to the prediction of Maximum compressive stresses and Blow per foot using a series of machine learning algorithms. A database of more than 4000 piles is employed to construct random forest regression (RFR) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) models. The 10-fold cross-validation method and Lasso regularisation are adapted to obtain the model of superior generalisation ability and better persuasive results. Lastly, the results of RFR and MARS models were compared and evaluated in accordance with the goodness of fit, running time and interpretability. The results show that the RFR model performs better than the MARS in terms of fitting and operational efficiency, but is short of interpretability.