Application of in situ stress estimation methods in wellbore stability analysis under isotropic and anisotropic conditions. (24th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Application of in situ stress estimation methods in wellbore stability analysis under isotropic and anisotropic conditions. (24th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Application of in situ stress estimation methods in wellbore stability analysis under isotropic and anisotropic conditions
- Authors:
- Gholami, Raoof
Rasouli, Vamegh
Aadnoy, Bernt
Mohammadi, Ramin - Abstract:
- Abstract: Estimation of in situ stresses is a key step in many petroleum engineering applications, ranging from wellbore stability to sanding analysis and hydraulic fracturing design. Direct techniques conventionally used to determine in situ stresses are indeed very time consuming and expensive. These measurements would also be restricted as to the depth of acquisition, and generalization of the results to entire rock masses may not yield representative results. In this paper, applications of three indirect methods–Zoback's polygon, shear moduli, and poroelastic–are studied to assess their applicability in providing reliable stress estimation under isotropic and anisotropic conditions. Determination of elastic, strength, and in situ stress parameters according to the assumption of each method for one of the vertical wells drilled in south Iran indicated that the shear moduli method is an appropriate approach for prediction of maximum horizontal stress within an interval where sufficient field data including leak-off tests are acquired. However, the poroelastic method seems to be a better method in prediction of in situ stresses under anisotropic conditions. This might be due to the presence of excessive shale formations in subsurface layers, causing structural or intrinsic anisotropy-based methods such as poroelastic equations to deliver more accurate results. However, making general conclusions based on studying a single vertical wellbore may not be sufficient, andAbstract: Estimation of in situ stresses is a key step in many petroleum engineering applications, ranging from wellbore stability to sanding analysis and hydraulic fracturing design. Direct techniques conventionally used to determine in situ stresses are indeed very time consuming and expensive. These measurements would also be restricted as to the depth of acquisition, and generalization of the results to entire rock masses may not yield representative results. In this paper, applications of three indirect methods–Zoback's polygon, shear moduli, and poroelastic–are studied to assess their applicability in providing reliable stress estimation under isotropic and anisotropic conditions. Determination of elastic, strength, and in situ stress parameters according to the assumption of each method for one of the vertical wells drilled in south Iran indicated that the shear moduli method is an appropriate approach for prediction of maximum horizontal stress within an interval where sufficient field data including leak-off tests are acquired. However, the poroelastic method seems to be a better method in prediction of in situ stresses under anisotropic conditions. This might be due to the presence of excessive shale formations in subsurface layers, causing structural or intrinsic anisotropy-based methods such as poroelastic equations to deliver more accurate results. However, making general conclusions based on studying a single vertical wellbore may not be sufficient, and therefore further studies are required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of geophysics and engineering. Volume 12:Number 4(2015:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Journal of geophysics and engineering
- Issue:
- Volume 12:Number 4(2015:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 12, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0012-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 657
- Page End:
- 673
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-24
- Subjects:
- stress estimations -- Zoback's method -- shear moduli method -- poroelastic equations -- anisotropy
Geophysics -- Periodicals
Prospecting -- Geophysical methods -- Periodicals
Engineering -- Periodicals
622.1505 - Journal URLs:
- http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-2140 ↗
http://ioppublishing.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1088/1742-2132/12/4/657 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1742-2132
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16495.xml