Mutant KIT as imatinib-sensitive target in metastatic sinonasal carcinoma. (29th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dieter, S. M.; Heining, C.; Agaimy, A.; Huebschmann, D.; Bonekamp, D.; Hutter, B.; Ehrenberg, K. R.; Fröhlich, M.; Schlesner, M.; Scholl, C.; Schlemmer, H.-P.; Wolf, S.; Mavratzas, A.; Jung, C. S.; Gröschel, S.; von Kalle, C.; Eils, R.; Brors, B.; Penzel, R.; Kriegsmann, M.; Reuss, D. E.; Schirmacher, P.; Stenzinger, A.; Federspil, P. A.; Weichert, W.; Glimm, H.; Fröhling, S.
• Is Part Of: Annals of oncology. Volume 28:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 142
• Page End: 148
• Publication Date: 2016-09-29
• Subjects: precision oncology -- cancer genomics -- head and neck cancer; Oncology -- Periodicals; 616.992
• DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw446
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0923-7534

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Sinonasal carcinomas (SNCs) comprise various rare tumor types that are characterized by marked histologic diversity and largely unknown molecular profiles, yet share an overall poor prognosis owing to an aggressive clinical course and frequent late-stage diagnosis. The lack of effective systemic therapies for locally advanced or metastatic SNC poses a major challenge to therapeutic decision making for individual patients. We here aimed to identify actionable genetic alterations in a patient with metastatic SNC whose tumor, despite all diagnostic efforts, could not be assigned to any known SNC category and was refractory to multimodal therapy. Patients and methods: We used whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing to identify a KIT exon 11 mutation (c.1733_1735del, p.D579del) as potentially druggable target in this patient and carried out cancer hotspot panel sequencing to detect secondary resistance-conferring mutations in KIT. Furthermore, as a step towards clinical exploitation of the recently described signatures of mutational processes in cancer genomes, we established and applied a novel bioinformatics algorithm that enables supervised analysis of the mutational catalogs of individual tumors. Results: Molecularly guided treatment with imatinib in analogy to the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) resulted in a dramatic and durable response with remission of nearly all tumor manifestations, indicating a dominant driver function of mutant KIT in this tumor. KIT dependency was further validated by a secondary KIT exon 17 mutation (c.2459_2462delATTCinsG, p.D820_S821delinsG) that was detected upon tumor progression after 10 months of imatinib treatment and provided a rationale for salvage therapy with regorafenib, which has activity against KIT exon 11/17 mutant GIST. Conclusions: These observations highlight the potential of unbiased genomic profiling for uncovering the vulnerabilities of individual malignancies, particularly in rare and unclassifiable tumors, and underscore that KIT exon 11 mutations represent tractable therapeutic targets across different histologies.