Estimation of Natural Indirect Effects Robust to Unmeasured Confounding and Mediator Measurement Error. Issue 6 (November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fulcher, Isabel R.; Shi, Xu; Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J.
• Is Part Of: Epidemiology. Volume 30:Issue 6(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-11
• Subjects: Causal inference -- Mediation -- Measurement error -- Natural indirect effect -- Unmeasured confounding; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; 614.405
• DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001084
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1044-3983

Abstract

Abstract : The use of causal mediation analysis to evaluate the pathways by which an exposure affects an outcome is widespread in the social and biomedical sciences. Recent advances in this area have established formal conditions for identification and estimation of natural direct and indirect effects. However, these conditions typically involve stringent assumptions of no unmeasured confounding and that the mediator has been measured without error. These assumptions may fail to hold in many practical settings where mediation methods are applied. The goal of this article is two-fold. First, we formally establish that the natural indirect effect can in fact be identified in the presence of unmeasured exposure–outcome confounding provided there is no additive interaction between the mediator and unmeasured confounder(s). Second, we introduce a new estimator of the natural indirect effect that is robust to both classical measurement error of the mediator and unmeasured confounding of both exposure–outcome and mediator–outcome relations under certain no interaction assumptions. We provide formal proofs and a simulation study to illustrate our results. In addition, we apply the proposed methodology to data from the Harvard President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program in Nigeria. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.