Increasing cervical cancer screening at a non-government medical center in Lilongwe, Malawi. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kakani, Preeti; Kojima, Noah; Banda, Ben A; Lewis, Samuel; Suri, Rajat; Chibwana, Florence; Chivwara, Mackenzie; Sullivan, Lauren; Chimombo, Mayamiko; Sigauke, Hitler; Tymchuk, Chris; Kahn, Daniel
• Is Part Of: International journal of STD & AIDS. Volume 32:Number 10(2021)
• Page Start: 933
• Page End: 939
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Human papillomavirus < viral disease -- Africa < location -- screening < other -- women < other -- human immunodeficiency virus < viral disease; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; 616.951
• DOI: 10.1177/09564624211007260
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-4624

Abstract

Malawi has the highest incidence of and mortality rate due to cervical cancer in the world. This is largely because of inadequate screening and high rates of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, which greatly increases cervical cancer risk. We describe the implementation of a quality improvement program to increase use of cervical cancer screening at a non-government medical center in Lilongwe, Malawi. The intervention, developed and launched from March to August 2017, aimed to promote education among patients and clinicians about the importance of cervical cancer screening and improve accessibility of screening information within medical records. Visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) was used to screen for cervical cancer. Women with a positive VIA were offered treatment using thermocoagulation. The number of VIA screenings conducted in 2016 (pre-intervention), 2017 (intervention), and 2018 (post-intervention) was 125, 234 and 456, respectively. Of the 815 women screened during this period, 36 (4.4%) had a VIA-positive result and 12 (1.5%) had suspect cancer. Of the VIA-positive women, 13 (36.1%) received same-day treatment with thermocoagulation. An interrupted time series regression revealed that there was a sustained increase in monthly screenings between the pre- and post-intervention period ( β = 30.84; p = 0.006; 95% CI 9.72–51.97), suggesting that the intervention likely was effective in increasing cervical cancer screening. Our results demonstrate that focusing on developing sustainable solutions and improving system processes, without additional equipment or funding, significantly increased the number of women screened and should be considered in other settings to enhance cervical cancer prevention services.