Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock. Issue 5 (November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock. Issue 5 (November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Effect of Coagulation Factor Concentrates on Markers of Endothelial Cell Damage in Experimental Hemorrhagic Shock
- Authors:
- Hofmann, Nikolaus
Zipperle, Johannes
Brettner, Florian
Jafarmadar, Mohammad
Ashmwe, Mostafa
Keibl, Claudia
Ponschab, Martin
Kipman, Ulrike
Bahrami, Arian
Redl, Heinz
Bahrami, Soheyl
Fuhrmann, Valentin
Schöchl, Herbert - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Background: Plasma-based resuscitation showed protective effects on the endothelial glycocalyx compared with crystalloid resuscitation. There is paucity of data regarding the effect of coagulation factor concentrates (CFC) on the glycocalyx in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We hypothesized that colloid-based resuscitation supplemented with CFCs offers a therapeutic value to treat endothelial damage following HS. Methods: Eighty-four rats were subjected to pressure-controlled (mean arterial pressure (MAP) 30–35 mm Hg) and lab-guided (targeted cutoff: lactate >2.2. mmol/L and base deficit > 5.5 mmol/L) HS. Animals were resuscitated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), human albumin (HA) or Ringer's lactate (RL) and RL or HA supplemented with fibrinogen concentrate (FC) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). Serum epinephrine and the following markers of endothelial damage were assessed at baseline and at the end-of-observation (120 min after shock was terminated): syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR 1). Results: Resuscitation with FFP had no effect on sVEGFR1 compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation (FFP: 19.3 ng/mL vs. RL: 15.9 ng/mL; RL+FC: 19.7 ng/mL; RL+PCC: 18.9 ng/mL; n.s.). At the end-of-observation, syndecan-1 was similar among all groups. Interestingly, HA+FC treated animals displayed the highest syndecan-1 concentration (12.07 ng/mL). Resuscitation with FFP restored heparan sulfate back to baselineABSTRACT: Background: Plasma-based resuscitation showed protective effects on the endothelial glycocalyx compared with crystalloid resuscitation. There is paucity of data regarding the effect of coagulation factor concentrates (CFC) on the glycocalyx in hemorrhagic shock (HS). We hypothesized that colloid-based resuscitation supplemented with CFCs offers a therapeutic value to treat endothelial damage following HS. Methods: Eighty-four rats were subjected to pressure-controlled (mean arterial pressure (MAP) 30–35 mm Hg) and lab-guided (targeted cutoff: lactate >2.2. mmol/L and base deficit > 5.5 mmol/L) HS. Animals were resuscitated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), human albumin (HA) or Ringer's lactate (RL) and RL or HA supplemented with fibrinogen concentrate (FC) or prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC). Serum epinephrine and the following markers of endothelial damage were assessed at baseline and at the end-of-observation (120 min after shock was terminated): syndecan-1, heparan sulfate, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR 1). Results: Resuscitation with FFP had no effect on sVEGFR1 compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation (FFP: 19.3 ng/mL vs. RL: 15.9 ng/mL; RL+FC: 19.7 ng/mL; RL+PCC: 18.9 ng/mL; n.s.). At the end-of-observation, syndecan-1 was similar among all groups. Interestingly, HA+FC treated animals displayed the highest syndecan-1 concentration (12.07 ng/mL). Resuscitation with FFP restored heparan sulfate back to baseline (baseline: 36 ng/mL vs. end-of-observation: 36 ng/mL). Conclusion: The current study revealed that plasma-based resuscitation normalized circulating heparan sulfate but not syndecan-1. Co-administration of CFC had no further effect on glycocalyx shedding suggesting a lack of its therapeutic potential. Level of evidence: V Experimental in vivo study. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Shock. Volume 52:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Shock
- Issue:
- Volume 52:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 52, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 52
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0052-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11
- Subjects:
- Endotheliopathy -- FFP -- fibrinogen concentrate -- prothrombin complex concentrate -- BL -- baseline -- CFC -- coagulation factor concentrates -- EOO -- end-of-observation -- EOS -- end-of-shock -- FC -- fibrinogen concentrate -- FFP -- fresh frozen plasma -- HA -- human albumin -- HR -- heart rate -- HS -- hemorrhagic shock -- MAP -- mean arterial pressure -- PCC -- prothrombin complex concentrate -- RL -- lactated Ringer's -- sVEGFR1 -- soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1
Shock -- Periodicals
Shock -- Periodicals
Choc (Pathologie) -- Périodiques
Shock
Periodicals
616.0475 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.shockjournal.com ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00024382-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001286 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1073-2322
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8267.443000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16485.xml