A Population-based Comparative Effectiveness Study of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fracture Surgery. (November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Population-based Comparative Effectiveness Study of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fracture Surgery. (November 2019)
- Main Title:
- A Population-based Comparative Effectiveness Study of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fracture Surgery
- Authors:
- Hamilton, Gavin M.
Lalu, Manoj M.
Ramlogan, Reva
Bryson, Gregory L.
Abdallah, Faraj W.
McCartney, Colin J. L.
McIsaac, Daniel I. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Adverse outcomes and resource use rates are high after hip fracture surgery. Peripheral nerve blocks could improve outcomes through enhanced analgesia and decreased opioid related adverse events. We hypothesized that these benefits would translate into decreased resource use (length of stay [primary outcome] and costs), and better clinical outcomes (pneumonia and mortality). Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of hip fracture surgery patients in Ontario, Canada (2011 to 2015) using linked health administrative data. Multilevel regression, instrumental variable, and propensity scores were used to determine the association of nerve blocks with resource use and outcomes. Results: The authors identified 65, 271 hip fracture surgery patients; 10, 030 (15.4%) received a block. With a block, the median hospital stay was 7 (interquartile range, 4 to 13) days versus 8 (interquartile range, 5 to 14) days without. Following adjustment, nerve blocks were associated with a 0.6-day decrease in length of stay (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.8). This small difference was consistent with instrumental variable (1.1 days; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.2) and propensity score (0.2 days; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.3) analyses. Costs were lower with a nerve block (adjusted difference, −$1, 421; 95% CI, −$1, 579 to −$1, 289 [Canadian dollars]), but no difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.11) or pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16)Abstract : Background: Adverse outcomes and resource use rates are high after hip fracture surgery. Peripheral nerve blocks could improve outcomes through enhanced analgesia and decreased opioid related adverse events. We hypothesized that these benefits would translate into decreased resource use (length of stay [primary outcome] and costs), and better clinical outcomes (pneumonia and mortality). Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of hip fracture surgery patients in Ontario, Canada (2011 to 2015) using linked health administrative data. Multilevel regression, instrumental variable, and propensity scores were used to determine the association of nerve blocks with resource use and outcomes. Results: The authors identified 65, 271 hip fracture surgery patients; 10, 030 (15.4%) received a block. With a block, the median hospital stay was 7 (interquartile range, 4 to 13) days versus 8 (interquartile range, 5 to 14) days without. Following adjustment, nerve blocks were associated with a 0.6-day decrease in length of stay (95% CI, 0.5 to 0.8). This small difference was consistent with instrumental variable (1.1 days; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.2) and propensity score (0.2 days; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.3) analyses. Costs were lower with a nerve block (adjusted difference, −$1, 421; 95% CI, −$1, 579 to −$1, 289 [Canadian dollars]), but no difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.11) or pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.16) was observed. Conclusions: Receipt of nerve blocks for hip fracture surgery is associated with decreased length of stay and health system costs, although small effect sizes may not reflect clinical significance for length of stay. Abstract : Among elderly patients undergoing emergency hip fracture surgery in Ontario, Canada, peripheral nerve blocks may be associated with slightly decreased postoperative lengths of stay and health system costs. The use of peripheral nerve blocks was not associated with a difference in postoperative pneumonia rates. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Anesthesiology. Volume 131:Number 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Anesthesiology
- Issue:
- Volume 131:Number 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 131, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 131
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0131-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11
- Subjects:
- Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthetics -- Periodicals
Anesthesia -- Periodicals
617.9605 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00000542-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_issn=0003-3022 ↗
http://www.anesthesiology.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002947 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-3022
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0900.600000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16499.xml