Endoscopic management of patients with post‐surgical leaks involving the gastrointestinal tract: A large case series. Issue 6 (1st December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Manta, Raffaele; Caruso, Angelo; Cellini, Carlo; Sica, Mariano; Zullo, Angelo; Mirante, Vincenzo Giorgio; Bertani, Helga; Frazzoni, Marzio; Mutignani, Massimiliano; Galloro, Giuseppe; Conigliaro, Rita
• Is Part Of: United European Gastroenterology journal. Volume 4:Issue 6(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 770
• Page End: 777
• Publication Date: 2016-12-01
• Subjects: Anastomotic leak -- fistula -- endoscopy -- treatment -- OTSC -- SEMS -- fibrin glue; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.33005
• DOI: 10.1177/2050640615626051
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2050-6406

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Post‐surgical anastomotic leaks often require a re‐intervention, are associated with a definite morbidity and mortality, and with relevant costs. We described a large series of patients with different post‐surgical leaks involving the gastrointestinal tract managed with endoscopy as initial approach. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected cases with anastomotic leaks managed with different endoscopic approaches (with surgical or radiological drainage when needed) in two endoscopic centres during 5 years. Interventions included: (1) over‐the‐scope clip (OTSC) positioning; (2) placement of a covered self‐expanding metal stent (SEMS); (3) fibrin glue injection (Tissucol); and (4) endo‐sponge application, according to both the endoscopic feature and patient's status. Results: A total of 76 patients underwent endoscopic treatment for a leak either in the upper (47 cases) or lower (29 cases) gastrointestinal tract, and the approach was successful in 39 (83%) and 22 (75.9%) patients, respectively, accounting for an overall 80.3% success rate. Leak closure was achieved in 84.9% and 78.3% of patients managed by using a single or a combination of endoscopic devices. Overall, leak closure failed in 15 (19.7%) patients, and the surgical approach was successful in all 14 patients who underwent re‐intervention, whilst one patient died due to sepsis at 7 days. Conclusions: Our data suggest that an endoscopic approach, with surgical or radiological drainage when needed, is successful and safe in the majority of patients with anastomotic gastrointestinal leaks. Therefore, an endoscopic treatment could be attempted before resorting to more invasive, costly and risky re‐intervention.