Active care of infants born between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation does not follow consensus expert recommendations. (14th February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sinclair, Ruth; Bajuk, Barbara; Guaran, Robert; Challis, Daniel; Sheils, Joanne; Abdel‐Latif, Mohamed E.; Hilder, Lisa; Wright, Ian M.; Oei, Ju Lee
• Is Part Of: Acta pædiatrica. Volume 108:Number 7(2019)
• Page Start: 1222
• Page End: 1229
• Publication Date: 2019-02-14
• Subjects: Consensus statement -- Delivery room resuscitation -- Extremely preterm -- Outcomes; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; Pediatrics; 618.92
• DOI: 10.1111/apa.14714
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0803-5253

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To determine the relationship between clinical practice and publication of an Australian consensus statement for management of extremely preterm infants in 2006. Methods: A population‐based study using linked data from New South Wales, Australia for births between 22 + 0 and 26 + 6 weeks of gestation between 2000 and 2011. Results: There were 4746 births of whom 2870 were liveborn and 1876 were stillborn. Of the live births, 2041 (71%) were resuscitated, 1914 (67%) were admitted into a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and 1310 (46%) survived to hospital discharge. Thirty‐nine (2%) stillbirths were resuscitated but none survived. No 22‐week infant survived to hospital discharge. Fewer 23‐week gestation infants were resuscitated between 2004 (52%) and 2005 (20%) but resuscitation rates increased by 2008 (44%). There was no difference at other gestations. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) for resuscitation was increased by birthweight (OR: 1.01), tertiary hospital birth (OR: 3.4) and Caesarean delivery (OR: 11.3) and decreased by rural residence (OR: 0.4) and male gender (OR: 0.7). Conclusion: Expert recommendations may be shaped by clinical practice rather than the converse, especially for 23‐week gestation infants. Recommendations should be revised regularly to include clinical practice changes. Abstract :