Early electroencephalography for outcome prediction of postanoxic coma: A prospective cohort study. Issue 2 (24th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ruijter, Barry J.; Tjepkema‐Cloostermans, Marleen C.; Tromp, Selma C.; van den Bergh, Walter M.; Foudraine, Norbert A.; Kornips, Francois H. M.; Drost, Gea; Scholten, Erik; Bosch, Frank H.; Beishuizen, Albertus; van Putten, Michel J. A. M.; Hofmeijer, Jeannette
• Is Part Of: Annals of neurology. Volume 86:Issue 2(2019)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 214
• Publication Date: 2019-06-24
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Pediatric neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1002/ana.25518
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0364-5134

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To provide evidence that early electroencephalography (EEG) allows for reliable prediction of poor or good outcome after cardiac arrest. Methods: In a 5‐center prospective cohort study, we included consecutive, comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Continuous EEG recordings were started as soon as possible and continued up to 5 days. Five‐minute EEG epochs were assessed by 2 reviewers, independently, at 8 predefined time points from 6 hours to 5 days after cardiac arrest, blinded for patients' actual condition, treatment, and outcome. EEG patterns were categorized as generalized suppression (<10 μV), synchronous patterns with ≥50% suppression, continuous, or other. Outcome at 6 months was categorized as good (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5). Results: We included 850 patients, of whom 46% had a good outcome. Generalized suppression and synchronous patterns with ≥50% suppression predicted poor outcome without false positives at ≥6 hours after cardiac arrest. Their summed sensitivity was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42–0.51) at 12 hours and 0.30 (95% CI = 0.26–0.33) at 24 hours after cardiac arrest, with specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.99–1.00) at both time points. At 36 hours or later, sensitivity for poor outcome was ≤0.22. Continuous EEG patterns at 12 hours predicted good outcome, with sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.46–0.55) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88–0.93); at 24 hours or later, specificity for the prediction of good outcome was <0.90. Interpretation: EEG allows for reliable prediction of poor outcome after cardiac arrest, with maximum sensitivity in the first 24 hours. Continuous EEG patterns at 12 hours after cardiac arrest are associated with good recovery. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:203–214