Compensating the effect of residual dipole energy on dielectric response for effective diagnosis of power transformer insulation. Issue 3 (1st May 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mishra, Deepak; Baral, Arijit; Chakravorti, Sivaji
• Is Part Of: IET science, measurement & technology. Volume 12:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 314
• Page End: 322
• Publication Date: 2018-05-01
• Subjects: power transformer insulation -- compensation -- electric current measurement -- reliability; residual dipole energy compensation effect -- dielectric response -- power transformer insulation -- reliability -- insulation diagnosis method -- recorded polarisation depolarisation current -- field measurement relaxation current measurement equipment -- DC charging voltage application -- dissipation factor -- polarisation index -- paper‐moisture; Measurement -- Periodicals; Electrical engineering -- Periodicals; Electronics -- Periodicals; Nanotechnology -- Periodicals; Electromagnetism -- Periodicals; Medical instruments and apparatus -- Periodicals; 621.3
• DOI: 10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0216
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-8822

Abstract

Abstract : Analysis of relaxation current is a widely accepted method for diagnosis of power transformer insulation. The accuracy of such diagnostic tool is dependent on insulation model parameters which are formulated using relaxation current. This implies that the accuracy and hence the reliability of existing insulation diagnosis methods indirectly depends on the accuracy of the recorded polarisation depolarisation current. Sometimes during field measurement relaxation current measurement equipment fails to record proper current, even after application of dc charging voltage. As per utilities, this primarily happens due to improper/loose connections (this cannot be avoided entirely due to the involvement of human factors) and such situation is usually followed by checking and rectifying improper connection. The analysis presented in this study shows that the polarisation current recorded immediately after rectifying the correction is inaccurate and leads to the erroneous diagnosis. Furthermore, it is observed that in these cases, the measured and calculated (using insulation model) values of performance parameters like dissipation factor, polarisation index, and paper‐moisture differ by a large extent. This work is aimed at removing the effect of this residual dipole energy introduced during the improper connection phase.