Effect of different standing poses on whole body volume acquisition by three‐dimensional photonic scanning. Issue 6 (1st September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chiu, Chuang‐Yuan; Pease, David L.; Sanders, Ross H.
• Is Part Of: IET science, measurement & technology. Volume 10:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: 553
• Page End: 556
• Publication Date: 2016-09-01
• Subjects: pose estimation -- image scanners -- regression analysis; standing pose effect -- body volume acquisition -- three‐dimensional photonic scanning -- 3D photonic scanning -- body composition estimation -- regression equation -- pose estimation; Measurement -- Periodicals; Electrical engineering -- Periodicals; Electronics -- Periodicals; Nanotechnology -- Periodicals; Electromagnetism -- Periodicals; Medical instruments and apparatus -- Periodicals; 621.3
• DOI: 10.1049/iet-smt.2015.0252
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-8822

Abstract

Abstract : The present study compared whole body volumes obtained by three‐dimensional (3D) photonic scanning of two different poses and discussed its effect on body composition estimation. Pose A with large angles of shoulder abduction and feet separated and Pose B with shoulders abducted slightly, the elbows extended and heels together. 16 male and 13 female participants were scanned twice in each pose using a 3D scanner. The mean of whole body volume and the mean of body composition obtained with Pose B was corrected by a regression equation and compared with the results obtained from Pose A. After correction, the whole body volumes acquired with these two poses were similar [limit of agreement = (−0.71 l, 0.71 l)] but the body compositions obtained with Pose A and Pose B were different [limit of agreement = (−4.4%, 4.4%)]. The results indicated that scanning using either pose gives reliable estimations for whole body volume and body composition. The whole body volume obtained from different poses can be adjusted using the regression equation but small volumetric differences translate into much more substantial differences in body fat percentage. Hence, it is recommended to use the same scanning pose consistently when monitoring individuals longitudinally.