Natural orifice transendoluminal surgery and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the future of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. (March 2011)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barret, Eric; Sanchez-Salas, Rafael; Ercolani, Matthew C; Rozet, Francois; Galiano, Marc; Cathelineau, Xavier
• Is Part Of: Future oncology. Volume 7:Number 3(2011)
• Page Start: 427
• Page End: 434
• Publication Date: 2011-03
• Subjects: LESS -- minimally invasive surgery -- NOTES -- radical prostatectomy -- robotic prostatectomy -- single-port surgery; Oncology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.10
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1479-6694

Abstract

Techniques for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP) have been carefully reviewed by surgical teams worldwide in order to identify possible weaknesses and facilitate further improvement in their overall performance. The initial plan of action has been to carefully study the best-practice techniques for open RP in order to reproduce and standardize performance from the laparoscopic perspective. Similar to open surgery, the learning curve of minimally invasive RP has been well documented in terms of objective evaluation of outcomes for cancer control and functional results. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) have recently gained momentum as feasible techniques for minimal access urological surgery. NOTES––LESS drastically limit the surgeon''s ability to choose the site of entry for operative instruments; therefore, the advantages of NOTES––LESS are gained with the understanding that the surgical procedure is more technically challenging. There are several key elements in RP techniques (in particular, dorsal vein control, apex exposure and cavernosal nerve sparing) that can have significant implications on oncologic and functional results. These steps are hard to perform in a limited working field. LESS radical prostatectomy can clearly be facilitated by using robotic technology.