Future of cardiac surgery: minimally invasive techniques in sutureless valve resection. (September 2009)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Folliguet, Thierry; Dibie, Alain; Laborde, Franççois
• Is Part Of: Future cardiology. Volume 5:Number 5(2009)
• Page Start: 443
• Page End: 452
• Publication Date: 2009-09
• Subjects: pathological analysis -- perceval sutureless valve -- percutaneous aortic valve replacement; Cardiology -- Research -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.2217/fca.09.35
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1479-6678

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement with mechanical or biological heart valves is the treatment of choice for aortic valve stenosis when it is symptomatic or with severe aortic stenosis (≤≤ 0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) or with left ventricular dysfunction. In an effort to improve the outcomes of patients with stented biological valves, stentless valves were introduced to clinical practices in the early 1990s. Theses valves were designed to be less obstructive, and thus result in a lower transvalvular gradient. Technically the implantations of these valves are more demanding resulting in longer cross clamp and bypass times. However, important comorbid conditions in elderly patients referred for aortic valve replacement require alternative treatment options with possible reductions of the extracorporeal bypass time and reliable hemodynamic features. In order to comply with these requirements, percutaneous valves and sutureless surgical valves have been developed. The percutaneous technique has the advantage of being performed without circulatory bypass but leaving the aortic calcifications in place, thereby resulting in a high degree of paravalvular insufficiency, atrioventricular block and strokes. The surgical approach has the advantage of removing all calcifications and the valves can be optimally implanted, resulting in minimal paravalvular leak with a low incidence of atrioventricular block and strokes; however, it requires cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, it can be performed with a low mortality (<3% in isolated aortic replacement, even in older patients). This article reviews the various techniques, strength and limitations of these sutureless valves implanted in the aortic position.