Gender differences in the relationship between land ownership and managerial rights: Implications for intrahousehold farm labor allocation. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kang, Munsu; Schwab, Benjamin; Yu, Jisang
• Is Part Of: World development. Volume 125(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: Land rights -- Gender equality -- Farm labor -- LSMS -- Ethiopia -- Malawi; Economic history -- 1990- -- Periodicals; Economic assistance -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 330.9
• DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104669
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-750X

Abstract

Highlights: We investigate land ownership, management, and farm labor in Ethiopia and Malawi. We find high gender gaps concordance between ownership and managerial rights. 'Jointness' in plot ownership and management slightly disfavors females. Labor allocation and plot control follow gender-concordant pattern. Own-gender effects vary across different domains of plot controls. Abstract: Recent research has increased interest in the intersection of land tenure and gender roles in African agriculture. While formalization of land ownership has been found to have important gender impacts, time use and management remain critical to both the productivity of agricultural operations as well as the welfare of household members. Thus, it is important to understand how gender intersects with the relationship between the ownership and operation of plots. We use plot level data from nationally representative household surveys in Ethiopia and Malawi to characterize the structure (sole male; sole female; or joint) and domain (plot ownership; plot management; or output management) of control over land in each household. We then answer the following research questions: 1) are there any gender gaps in the degrees of the concordance among different domains of controls? and 2) how does the structure of ownership and managerial rights affect labor allocations on plots? We find that for both males and females, sole managerial rights are most likely to occur in plots owned exclusively by either gender. However, on jointly owned plots, instances of sole planting rights are almost exclusively male. We also find that while females supply more of their own labor to plots they control, the pattern of own-gender bias in labor allocation varies with each structure-domain combination. The heterogeneity suggests gender inequality analyses related to land rights are sensitive to the choice of domain of control.