Chlorine is preferred over bisulfite for H2O2 quenching following UV-AOP drinking water treatment. (15th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Chlorine is preferred over bisulfite for H2O2 quenching following UV-AOP drinking water treatment. (15th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- Chlorine is preferred over bisulfite for H2O2 quenching following UV-AOP drinking water treatment
- Authors:
- Wang, Chengjin
Hofmann, Michael
Safari, Armin
Viole, Isabelle
Andrews, Susan
Hofmann, Ron - Abstract:
- Abstract: Drinking water treatment using UV/H2 O2 advanced oxidation typically results in residual H2 O2 that requires quenching to minimize its interference with downstream processes. Chemical quenching using chlorine or bisulfite are options, but there is some uncertainty in the literature about the kinetics of the bisulfite reaction, with some reports quoting the reaction as fast, and others as slow. Part of the contradictory information may be due to interference in H2 O2 analysis by bisulfite. An analytical method was developed to avoid this interference, in which monochloramine first selectively quenched bisulfite, and then H2 O2 was measured spectrometrically using titanium(IV) oxysulfate for color development. The confirmatory experiments suggested that the bisulfite reaction with H2 O2 is actually relatively slow, with a half-life in the order of hours to days depending on the pH and the reagent concentrations. As a result, within the typical pH range of drinking water treatment (e.g., 6–9), chlorine is preferred over bisulfite as the H2 O2 quenching agent on the basis of reaction kinetics. However, a decrease in pH will lead to an increase in the bisulfite-H2 O2 reaction rate along with a decrease in the Cl2 –H2 O2 reaction rate, such that at pH < 5.7 bisulfite is the faster reagent. Both bisulfite and chlorine were observed to react with H2 O2 following a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 in the natural water matrix tested. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights:Abstract: Drinking water treatment using UV/H2 O2 advanced oxidation typically results in residual H2 O2 that requires quenching to minimize its interference with downstream processes. Chemical quenching using chlorine or bisulfite are options, but there is some uncertainty in the literature about the kinetics of the bisulfite reaction, with some reports quoting the reaction as fast, and others as slow. Part of the contradictory information may be due to interference in H2 O2 analysis by bisulfite. An analytical method was developed to avoid this interference, in which monochloramine first selectively quenched bisulfite, and then H2 O2 was measured spectrometrically using titanium(IV) oxysulfate for color development. The confirmatory experiments suggested that the bisulfite reaction with H2 O2 is actually relatively slow, with a half-life in the order of hours to days depending on the pH and the reagent concentrations. As a result, within the typical pH range of drinking water treatment (e.g., 6–9), chlorine is preferred over bisulfite as the H2 O2 quenching agent on the basis of reaction kinetics. However, a decrease in pH will lead to an increase in the bisulfite-H2 O2 reaction rate along with a decrease in the Cl2 –H2 O2 reaction rate, such that at pH < 5.7 bisulfite is the faster reagent. Both bisulfite and chlorine were observed to react with H2 O2 following a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 in the natural water matrix tested. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Bisulfite quenches H2 O2 at too slow a rate to serve as a quenching agent. Cl2 quenches H2 O2 quickly at neutral and basic pH, but not instantaneously. A modified titanium(IV) method was developed to quantify H2 O2 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Water research. Volume 165(2019)
- Journal:
- Water research
- Issue:
- Volume 165(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 165, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 165
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0165-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-15
- Subjects:
- Advanced oxidation -- H2O2 quenching -- Chlorine -- Sodium bisulfite
Water -- Pollution -- Research -- Periodicals
363.7394 - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1769499.html ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00431354 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115000 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0043-1354
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9273.400000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16398.xml