Effect of surface acidity of Al2O3 supported metal catalysts on catalytic activity and carbon deposition during SCWG of glucose. (May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hossain, Md Zakir; Chowdhury, Muhammad B.I.; Charpentier, Paul A.
• Is Part Of: Biomass and bioenergy. Volume 124(2019)
• Page Start: 142
• Page End: 150
• Publication Date: 2019-05
• Subjects: Surface acidity -- Carbon deposition -- H2 production -- Supercritical water gasification -- Al2O3 catalyst and glucose; Biomass energy -- Periodicals; Biomass -- Periodicals; Energy-Generating Resources -- Periodicals; Bioénergie -- Périodiques; 333.9539
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0961-9534

Abstract

Abstract: In this study, the impact of a catalyst's surface acidity on supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of glucose is investigated. Four different catalysts including Ni, Ru 0·2 Ni, Ru 0·5 Ni and NiLa were prepared on an Al2 O3 support via an incipient impregnation method. NH3 -TPD and pyridine-FTIR results of the fresh catalysts showed that NiLa was the least acidic amongst the four investigated catalysts. Although the BET surface area for all four catalysts were similar, the NiLa and Ru 0·5 Ni catalysts were found to significantly reduce carbon deposition during SCWG of glucose, attributed to their lower acidic nature. Production of H2 was also increased by 1.52 and 1.21 × using the NiLa and Ru 0·5 Ni compared to Ni. The carbon deposition was characterized by TG-DTA, TPO, XRD and Raman spectroscopy, showing that the higher the acidic nature of the catalyst, the higher the tendency for carbon deposition. Using a lower acidic catalyst for SCWG helped minimize the catalyst's deactivation, while improving the catalyst lifetime This study shows that the acidic nature of the catalyst is an important consideration towards a better understanding of the SCWG mechanism. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Catalytic activity is negatively affected by its surface acidity. Surface acidity is found to be responsible for carbon deposition. H2 production is increased by 1.52 and 1.21 times using lower acidic NiLa and Ru 0·5 Ni, respectively compared to higher acidic Ni catalyst. Higher the acidity, the higher the carbon deposition and lower catalytic activity.