Two novel qualitative transcriptional signatures robustly applicable to non‐research‐oriented colorectal cancer samples with low‐quality RNA. Issue 7 (14th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheng, Jun; Guo, Yating; Guan, Guoxian; Huang, Haiyan; Jiang, Fengle; He, Jun; Wu, Junling; Guo, Zheng; Liu, Xing; Ao, Lu
• Is Part Of: Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. Volume 25:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 3622
• Page End: 3633
• Publication Date: 2021-03-14
• Subjects: colorectal cancer -- low‐quality RNA -- non‐research‐oriented clinical samples -- relative expression orderings -- transcriptional signature; Cytology; Medicine; Molecular Biology; Cytologie -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; Biologie moléculaire -- Périodiques; Cytology -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; 611.01805
• DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.16467
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1582-1838

Abstract

Abstract: Currently, due to the low quality of RNA caused by degradation or low abundance, the accuracy of gene expression measurements by transcriptome sequencing (RNA‐seq) is very challenging for non‐research‐oriented clinical samples, majority of which are preserved in hospitals or tissue banks worldwide with complete pathological information and follow‐up data. Molecular signatures consisting of several genes are rarely applied to such samples. To utilize these resources effectively, 45 stage II non‐research‐oriented samples which were formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) colorectal carcinoma samples (CRC) using RNA‐seq have been analysed. Our results showed that although gene expression measurements were significantly affected, most cancer features, based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs, were well preserved. We then developed two REO‐based signatures, which consisted of 136 gene pairs for early diagnosis of CRC, and 4500 gene pairs for predicting post‐surgery relapse risk of stage II and III CRC. The performance of our signatures, which included hundreds or thousands of gene pairs, was more robust for non‐research‐oriented clinical samples, compared to that of two published concise REO‐based signatures. In conclusion, REO‐based signatures with relatively more gene pairs could be robustly applied to non‐research‐oriented CRC samples.