Maternal and neonatal outcomes among incarcerated women who gave birth in custody. Issue 1 (27th December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shlafer, Rebecca; Saunders, Jennifer B.; Boraas, Christy M.; Kozhimannil, Katy B.; Mazumder, Narayana; Freese, Rebecca
• Is Part Of: Birth. Volume 48:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 122
• Page End: 131
• Publication Date: 2020-12-27
• Subjects: birth outcomes -- doulas -- pregnancy -- prison; Childbirth -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Newborn infants -- Care -- Periodicals; Natural childbirth -- Periodicals; 618.1
• DOI: 10.1111/birt.12524
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7659

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In the United States, the population of incarcerated women has increased by more than 600% since the 1980s. With this rise, correctional facilities have faced new challenges meeting the health care needs of women, especially those who are pregnant. This retrospective cohort study sought to describe five indicators of maternal and neonatal health among women who gave birth in custody, and to compare outcomes among incarcerated women who did and did not receive enhanced pregnancy support. Methods: We used deidentified electronic health records (EHRs) to examine maternal and neonatal birth outcomes (ie, mode of birth, low birthweight, preterm birth, APGAR score, NICU admission) among women who gave birth in custody. Regression models examined differences in outcomes between women who received enhanced pregnancy support—group prenatal education and one‐on‐one doula visits—and a historical control group of women who received standard prenatal care. Results: Adverse maternal and neonatal birth outcomes in this sample were rare. No differences in outcomes were found between incarcerated women who received enhanced pregnancy support and the historical control group. Conclusions: Despite evidence for the benefits of enhanced pregnancy support in the general population, this study did not find differences in outcomes between incarcerated women who did and did not receive support. Integrated data from prison and hospital records are innovative, but effect measurement is limited by sample size. Future research should include primary data collection on maternal, neonatal, and dyadic outcomes longitudinally and across prisons.