How long should we run the code? Survival analysis based on location and duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after in-hospital cardiac arrest. Issue 2 (4th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Raza, Ahmad; Arslan, Ahmad; Ali, Zain; Patel, Rajeshkumar
• Is Part Of: Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives. Volume 11:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 206
• Page End: 211
• Publication Date: 2021-03-04
• Subjects: Cardiac arrest -- rosc -- survival -- duration of cardiac arrest -- location -- age; Internal medicine -- Periodicals; Hospitals -- Periodicals; Hospitals, Community; Internal Medicine; Hospitals; Internal medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1877396
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-9666

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background : The duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly affects long-term survival in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA). In this study, we questioned the long-term clinical benefits of extending CPR beyond twenty minutes for patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest. Additionally, we aimed to compare the outcomes of CPR at different locations of a large tertiary care community hospital. Methods : This study was a retrospective chart review of 169 patients with IHCA recorded between 1 January 2016, and 31 December 2018, at a large volume tertiary care community hospital. Results : Of the 169 patients suffering from cardiac arrest during hospitalization, 44.4% arrested in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 55.6% in a non-critical care setting. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved in 60% of ICU and 70.2% of non-ICU patients. While only 20% of ICU patients survived the cardiac arrest, the overall survival for non-ICU patients was 31.9%. Despite the significant difference in percentage survival, survival difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.082) due to the small sample size. Overall survival was 26.6%. An initial shockable rhythm was associated with improved survival compared to a non-shockable rhythm (41% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.022). In patients who had cardiac arrest for less than 20 minutes, 60.9% of patients achieved ROSC, compared to 37.9% who arrested for more than 20 minutes. Survival to hospital discharge was significantly lower for patients who had cardiac arrest for more than 20 minutes, compared to patients who were arrested for less than 20 minutes (3.1% vs. 41.3%, p = <0.0001). For patients who had a cardiac arrest for more than 30 minutes, ROSC was achieved in only 14.8% of patients. None of these patients survived to be discharged from the hospital (p = <0.0001). The mean age for the patients in this study was 70 years. 52.6% of subjects were male, and 47.4% were females. Older age was not related to shorter duration of CPR (Pearson correlation: 0.030, P = 0.69). Conclusion : Survival was significantly lower when CPR was unsuccessful for twenty minutes, and there is no survival benefit of extending CRP for more than 30 minutes. Lowest survival after a cardiac arrest on the general medical floor, compared to telemetry and ICU, may be related to delay in recognizing cardiac arrest and barriers in implementing standardized advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) protocol.