How pro-government militia ethnic relationships influence violence against civilians. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schon, Justin; Magid, Yehuda
• Is Part Of: Dynamics of asymmetric conflict. Volume 14:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 49
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: pro-government militia -- civil war -- ethnic conflict -- violence against civilians -- atrocity; Asymmetric warfare -- Periodicals; Genocide -- Periodicals; Terrorism -- Periodicals; Asymmetric warfare; Genocide; Terrorism; Periodicals; 355.02
• DOI: 10.1080/17467586.2020.1821069
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1746-7586

Abstract

ABSTRACT: How do ethnic links between governments and pro-government militias (PGMs) affect the abusive behaviour of PGMs? PGMs may recruit irrespective of ethnic group (Non-Ethnic PGMs), from the ethnic group that controls the government (Dominant PGMs), from quiescent groups not in control of the government (Peripheral PGMs), and from ethnic groups actively rebelling against the government (Defector PGMs). PGMs recruited on ethnic lines tend to have informal relationships with the government, so they often help the government avoid accountability for civilian targeting. Examining ethnic relationships rather than whether the relationship is informal or semi-official, however, reveals important nuances. Defector PGMs are both able to target selectively and are deterred from being too abusive. Peripheral PGMs can target civilians more frequently, but they tend to lack the capacity to carry out large-scale massacres. Dominant PGMs can and do carry out large-scale massacres, but they target civilians less frequently because they only act when government accountability is not a concern. Regression analysis of a global group-year dataset of PGM abuses (1989–2007) supports these expectations. Our analysis demonstrates the value of considering PGM ethnic relationships with the government.