Ecological mechanisms explaining interactions within plant–hummingbird networks: morphological matching increases towards lower latitudes. Issue 1922 (11th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sonne, Jesper; Vizentin-Bugoni, Jeferson; Maruyama, Pietro K.; Araujo, Andréa C.; Chávez-González, Edgar; Coelho, Aline G.; Cotton, Peter A.; Marín-Gómez, Oscar H.; Lara, Carlos; Lasprilla, Liliana R.; Machado, Caio G.; Maglianesi, Maria A.; Malucelli, Tiago S.; González, Ana M. Martín; Oliveira, Genilda M.; Oliveira, Paulo E.; Ortiz-Pulido, Raul; Rocca, Márcia A.; Rodrigues, Licléia C.; Sazima, Ivan; Simmons, Benno I.; Tinoco, Boris; Varassin, Isabela G.; Vasconcelos, Marcelo F.; O'Hara, Bob; Schleuning, Matthias; Rahbek, Carsten; Sazima, Marlies; Dalsgaard, Bo
• Is Part Of: Proceedings. Volume 287:Issue 1922(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-03-11
• Subjects: resource specialization -- forbidden links -- modularity -- phenology -- abundances -- pollination; Biology -- Periodicals; 570.5
• DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2873
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-8452

Abstract

Abstract : Interactions between species are influenced by different ecological mechanisms, such as morphological matching, phenological overlap and species abundances. How these mechanisms explain interaction frequencies across environmental gradients remains poorly understood. Consequently, we also know little about the mechanisms that drive the geographical patterns in network structure, such as complementary specialization and modularity. Here, we use data on morphologies, phenologies and abundances to explain interaction frequencies between hummingbirds and plants at a large geographical scale. For 24 quantitative networks sampled throughout the Americas, we found that the tendency of species to interact with morphologically matching partners contributed to specialized and modular network structures. Morphological matching best explained interaction frequencies in networks found closer to the equator and in areas with low-temperature seasonality. When comparing the three ecological mechanisms within networks, we found that both morphological matching and phenological overlap generally outperformed abundances in the explanation of interaction frequencies. Together, these findings provide insights into the ecological mechanisms that underlie geographical patterns in resource specialization. Notably, our results highlight morphological constraints on interactions as a potential explanation for increasing resource specialization towards lower latitudes.