A Diel Flux Balance Model Captures Interactions between Light and Dark Metabolism during Day-Night Cycles in C3 and Crassulacean Acid Metabolism Leaves      . Issue 2 (4th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheung, C.Y. Maurice; Poolman, Mark G.; Fell, David. A.; Ratcliffe, R. George; Sweetlove, Lee J.
• Is Part Of: Plant physiology. Volume 165:Issue 2(2014)
• Page Start: 917
• Page End: 929
• Publication Date: 2014-03-04
• Subjects: Plant physiology -- Periodicals; Botany -- Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 571.2
• DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.234468
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0032-0889

Abstract

Abstract : A diel flux balance modeling framework that integrates temporally separated metabolic networks provides realistic descriptions of light and dark metabolism in C3 and CAM leaves and suggests that energetics and nitrogen use efficiency are unlikely to have been drivers for the evolution of CAM . Abstract: Although leaves have to accommodate markedly different metabolic flux patterns in the light and the dark, models of leaf metabolism based on flux-balance analysis (FBA ) have so far been confined to consideration of the network under continuous light. An FBA framework is presented that solves the two phases of the diel cycle as a single optimization problem and, thus, provides a more representative model of leaf metabolism. The requirement to support continued export of sugar and amino acids from the leaf during the night and to meet overnight cellular maintenance costs forces the model to set aside stores of both carbon and nitrogen during the day. With only minimal constraints, the model successfully captures many of the known features of C3 leaf metabolism, including the recently discovered role of citrate synthesis and accumulation in the night as a precursor for the provision of carbon skeletons for amino acid synthesis during the day. The diel FBA model can be applied to other temporal separations, such as that which occurs in Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM ) photosynthesis, allowing a system-level analysis of the energetics of CAM . The diel model predicts that there is no overall energetic advantage to CAM, despite the potential for suppression of photorespiration through CO2 concentration. Moreover, any savings in enzyme machinery costs through suppression of photorespiration are likely to be offset by the higher flux demand of the CAM cycle. It is concluded that energetic or nitrogen use considerations are unlikely to be evolutionary drivers for CAM photosynthesis.