Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison. Issue 2 (May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison. Issue 2 (May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Towards automated extraction of 2D standard fetal head planes from 3D ultrasound acquisitions: A clinical evaluation and quality assessment comparison
- Authors:
- Skelton, E.
Matthew, J.
Li, Y.
Khanal, B.
Cerrolaza Martinez, J.J.
Toussaint, N.
Gupta, C.
Knight, C.
Kainz, B.
Hajnal, J.V.
Rutherford, M. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: Clinical evaluation of deep learning (DL) tools is essential to compliment technical accuracy metrics. This study assessed the image quality of standard fetal head planes automatically-extracted from three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound fetal head volumes using a customised DL-algorithm. Methods: Two observers retrospectively reviewed standard fetal head planes against pre-defined image quality criteria. Forty-eight images (29 transventricular, 19 transcerebellar) were selected from 91 transabdominal fetal scans (mean gestational age = 26 completed weeks, range = 20 +5 –32 +3 weeks). Each had two-dimensional (2D) manually-acquired (2D-MA), 3D operator-selected (3D-OS) and 3D-DL automatically-acquired (3D-DL) images. The proportion of adequate images from each plane and modality, and the number of inadequate images per plane was compared for each method. Inter and intra-observer agreement of overall image quality was calculated. Results: Sixty-seven percent of 3D-OS and 3D-DL transventricular planes were adequate quality. Forty-five percent of 3D-OS and 55% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes were adequate. Seventy-one percent of 3D-OS and 86% of 3D-DL transventricular planes failed with poor visualisation of intra-cranial structures. Eighty-six percent of 3D-OS and 80% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes failed due to inadequate visualisation of cerebellar hemispheres. Image quality was significantly different between 2D and 3D, however, no significantAbstract: Introduction: Clinical evaluation of deep learning (DL) tools is essential to compliment technical accuracy metrics. This study assessed the image quality of standard fetal head planes automatically-extracted from three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound fetal head volumes using a customised DL-algorithm. Methods: Two observers retrospectively reviewed standard fetal head planes against pre-defined image quality criteria. Forty-eight images (29 transventricular, 19 transcerebellar) were selected from 91 transabdominal fetal scans (mean gestational age = 26 completed weeks, range = 20 +5 –32 +3 weeks). Each had two-dimensional (2D) manually-acquired (2D-MA), 3D operator-selected (3D-OS) and 3D-DL automatically-acquired (3D-DL) images. The proportion of adequate images from each plane and modality, and the number of inadequate images per plane was compared for each method. Inter and intra-observer agreement of overall image quality was calculated. Results: Sixty-seven percent of 3D-OS and 3D-DL transventricular planes were adequate quality. Forty-five percent of 3D-OS and 55% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes were adequate. Seventy-one percent of 3D-OS and 86% of 3D-DL transventricular planes failed with poor visualisation of intra-cranial structures. Eighty-six percent of 3D-OS and 80% of 3D-DL transcerebellar planes failed due to inadequate visualisation of cerebellar hemispheres. Image quality was significantly different between 2D and 3D, however, no significant difference between 3D-modalities was demonstrated (p < 0.005). Inter-observer agreement of transventricular plane adequacy was moderate for both 3D-modalities, and weak for transcerebellar planes. Conclusion: The 3D-DL algorithm can automatically extract standard fetal head planes from 3D-head volumes of comparable quality to operator-selected planes. Image quality in 3D is inferior to corresponding 2D planes, likely due to limitations with 3D-technology and acquisition technique. Implications for practice: Automated image extraction of standard planes from US-volumes could facilitate use of 3DUS in clinical practice, however image quality is dependent on the volume acquisition technique. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiography. Volume 27:Issue 2(2021)
- Journal:
- Radiography
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Issue 2(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 2 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0027-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 519
- Page End:
- 526
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05
- Subjects:
- Clinical evaluation -- Fetal imaging -- Quality assessment -- Ultrasound
Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.0757 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10788174 ↗
http://www.radiographyonline.com/ ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/radi/ ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/10788174 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/10788174 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiography/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radi.2020.11.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1078-8174
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7237.001000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16320.xml