CRITIQUE OF BRIAN EARP'S WRITING TIPS FOR PHILOSOPHERS. Issue 58 (2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Frederick, Danny
• Is Part Of: Think. Volume 20:Issue 58(2021)
• Page Start: 81
• Page End: 87
• Publication Date: 2021
• Subjects: Philosophy -- Periodicals; 105
• DOI: 10.1017/S1477175621000063
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-1756

Abstract

ABSTRACT: I criticize Brian Earp's 'Some Writing Tips for Philosophy'. Earp's article is useful for someone who wishes to do well in analytic philosophy as currently practised but it also casts doubt on why such analytic philosophy would be of interest to someone who wants to learn something new. In addition to its good tips, Earp's article contains two bad tips which, if followed, will tend to produce a paper that says next to nothing. I list the two faulty tips, show how the practices of great philosophers and scientists contradict them, then set out some contrary good tips for philosophers who aim to write a paper that makes a contribution to our knowledge.