Evaluation of Surgical Freedom for Microscopic and Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approaches to the Sella. Issue 1 (19th January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Elhadi, Ali M; Hardesty, Douglas A; Zaidi, Hasan A; Kalani, M Yashar S; Nakaji, Peter; White, William L; Preul, Mark C; Little, Andrew S
• Is Part Of: Operative neurosurgery. Volume 11:Issue 1(2015)
• Page Start: 69
• Page End: 79
• Publication Date: 2015-01-19
• Subjects: Endoscopy -- Microscope -- Pituitary adenoma -- Surgical freedom -- Transsphenoidal surgery; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.480590
• DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000601
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2332-4252

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches to the sellar are well established. Surgical freedom is an important skull base principle that can be measured objectively and used to compare approaches. OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical freedom of 4 transsphenoidal approaches to the sella turcica to aid in surgical approach selection. METHODS: Four transsphenoidal approaches to the sella were performed on 8 silicon-injected cadaveric heads. Surgical freedom was determined with stereotactic image guidance using previously established techniques. The results are presented as the area of surgical freedom and angular surgical freedom (angle of attack) in the axial and sagittal planes. RESULTS: Mean total exposed area surgical freedom for the microscopic sublabial, endoscopic binostril, endoscopic uninostril, and microscopic endonasal approaches were 102 ± 13, 89 ± 6, 81 ± 4, and 69 ± 10 cm 2, respectively. The endoscopic binostril approach had the greatest surgical freedom at the pituitary gland and ipsilateral and contralateral internal carotid arteries (25.7 ± 5.4, 28.0 ± 4.0, and 23.0 ± 3.0 cm 2 ) compared with the microscopic sublabial (21.8 ± 3.5, 21.3 ± 2.4, and 19.5 ± 6.3 cm 2 ), microscopic endonasal (14.2 ± 2.7, 14.1 ± 3.2, and 16.3 ± 4.0 cm 2 ), and endoscopic uninostril (19.7 ± 4.8, 22.4 ± 2.3, and 19.5 ± 2.9 cm 2 ) approaches. Axial angle of attack was greatest for the microscopic sublabial approach to the same targets (14.7 ± 1.3°, 11.0 ± 1.5°, and 11.8 ± 1.1°). For the sagittal angle of attack, the endoscopic binostril approach was superior for all 3 targets (16.6 ± 1.7°, 17.2 ± 0.70°, and 15.5 ± 1.2°). CONCLUSION: Microscopic sublabial and endoscopic binostril approaches provided superior surgical freedom compared with the endonasal microscopic and uninostril endoscopic approaches. This work provides objective baseline values for the quantification and evaluation of future refinements in surgical technique or instrumentation.