Comparative features and outcomes between paediatric T-cell and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Issue 3 (March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Teachey, David T; Pui, Ching-Hon
• Is Part Of: Lancet oncology. Volume 20:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: e142
• Page End: e154
• Publication Date: 2019-03
• Subjects: Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Oncologie; Oncology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.994005
• DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30031-2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-2045

Abstract

Summary: Contemporary paediatric clinical trials have improved 5-year event-free survival above 85% and 5-year overall survival above 90% in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in many study groups, whilst outcomes for T-cell ALL are still lagging behind by 5–10% in most studies. Several factors have contributed to this discrepant outcome. First, patients with T-cell ALL are generally older than those with B-cell ALL and, therefore, have poorer tolerance to chemotherapy, especially dexamethasone and asparaginase, and have increased risk of extramedullary relapse. Second, a higher proportion of patients with B-cell ALL have favourable genetic subtypes (eg, ETV6–RUNX1 and high hyperdiploidy), which confer a superior outcome compared with favourable subtypes of T-cell ALL. Third, T-cell ALL blasts are generally more resistant to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs than are B-cell ALL blasts. Finally, patients with B-cell ALL are more amendable to available targeted therapies, such as Philadelphia chromosome-positive and some Philadelphia chromosome-like ALL cases to ABL-class tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and CD19-positive and CD22-postive B-cell ALL cases to a variety of immunotherapies. Several novel treatments under investigation might narrow the gap in survival between T-cell ALL and B-cell ALL, although novel treatment options for T-cell ALL are limited.