Access to big data as a remedy in big tech. Issue 1 (April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dadson, Nick; Snoddy, Iain; White, Joshua
• Is Part Of: Competition law journal. Volume 20:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 10
• Publication Date: 2021-04
• Subjects: Competition and Markets Authority -- CMA -- data access -- essential facility theory -- online platforms -- digital advertising -- innovation -- privacy
• DOI: 10.4337/clj.2021.01.01
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2516-5771

Abstract

Abstract : 'Big data' and 'big tech' have become central topics in recent antitrust debate and regulation. For example, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) recently published a report on online platforms, expressing concerns that the major platforms like Google are now protected from competition by such strong incumbency advantages. Underlying the CMA's theory of harm is the essential facility theory of antitrust, under which Google's ability to control access to its click-and-query data is seen as preventing its rivals from competing effectively. EU jurisprudence has identified three criteria to determine whether data are an essential facility and whether access should be mandated. First, the data must be indispensable to compete in the market. Secondly, absent data sharing, technical improvements by competitors must be hampered or precluded. Thirdly, there must be no objective justification to refuse competitors access to the data. It is difficult to reconcile the authorities' concerns with Google's click-and-query data with these criteria, however. Actual and potential alternatives exist; Google's competitors have been innovating in the search market for more than a decade; and there are objective reasons to limit data access, including threats to innovation and privacy concerns.