Alignment differs between patellofemoral osteoarthritis cases and matched controls: An upright 3D MRI study. Issue 3 (1st March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Macri, Erin M.; d'Entremont, Agnes G.; Crossley, Kay M.; Hart, Harvi F.; Forster, Bruce B.; Wilson, David R.; Ratzlaff, Charles R.; Goldsmith, Charlie H.; Khan, Karim M.
• Is Part Of: Journal of orthopaedic research. Volume 37:Issue 3(2019)
• Page Start: 640
• Page End: 648
• Publication Date: 2019-03-01
• Subjects: knee osteoarthritis -- 3D alignment -- upright MRI -- patellofemoral joint -- tibiofemoral joint; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Periodicals; 616.7
• DOI: 10.1002/jor.24237
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0736-0266

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and clinically important knee OA subgroup. Malalignment may be an important risk factor for PF OA. However, little is known about alignment in PF OA, particularly in an upright, weightbearing environment. Using a vertically‐oriented open‐bore MR scanner, we evaluated 3D knee alignment in 15 PF OA cases and 15 individually matched asymptomatic controls. We imaged one knee per participant while they stood two‐legged at four flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°), and also while they stood one‐legged at 30° knee flexion. We calculated 3D patellofemoral and tibiofemoral alignment. Using mixed effects models, four of the five patellofemoral measures differed by group. For key measures, PF OA patellae were 6.6° [95%CI 5.0, 8.2] more laterally tilted, 2.4 mm [1.3, 3.5] more laterally translated, and at least 3.7 mm [0.2, 7.2] more proximally translated compared to controls (more with knees flexed). Alignment did not differ between two‐legged stance and one‐legged stance in either group. Statement of Clinical Significance: Our study demonstrated significant and clinically relevant differences in alignment between PF OA cases and controls in upright standing and squatting positions. Our findings were similar to those in previous studies of PF OA using traditional MR scanners in supine positions, supporting the clinical usefulness of existing methods aimed at identifying individuals who may benefit from interventions designed to correct malalignment. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research ® Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 9999:1–9, 2019.