Health‐related stigma of noncommunicable neurological disease in rural adult populations: A scoping review. (12th December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Elliot, Valerie L.; Morgan, Debra; Kosteniuk, Julie; Froehlich Chow, Amanda; Bayly, Melanie
• Is Part Of: Health & social care in the community. Volume 27:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: e158
• Page End: e188
• Publication Date: 2018-12-12
• Subjects: adult -- neurological disease -- rural -- stigma; Public welfare -- Periodicals; Community health services -- Periodicals; Human services -- Periodicals; 362.1
• DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12694
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-0410

Abstract

Abstract: Stigma is a widely recognised public health issue. Many people with neurological disease and their families experience stigmatisation, adding to their burden of illness. Rural populations are typically small, lack anonymity, and often have a higher proportion of older adults with inadequate access to specialised services and resources. Although generally isolated, rural areas can offer benefits such as a sense of familiarity and interconnectedness. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the existing evidence on stigma associated with non‐communicable neurological disease in rural adult populations and identify key findings and gaps in the literature. Our literature search of peer‐reviewed English language articles published from 1 January 1992 to 22 June 2017 was conducted across five databases yielding 8, 209 results. After duplicate removal, pairs of reviewers independently screened 6, 436 studies according to inclusion criteria developed a priori; 36 articles were identified for inclusion in this review. Study characteristics were described and illustrated by frequency distribution, findings were grouped thematically, and each of the five types of stigma were identified (social, self, health professional, associative, structural). Four factors influencing stigma (knowledge, familiarity, beliefs, and rurality) and four overarching stigma‐related themes (concealment; exclusion; disempowerment, discrimination, and unequal opportunities; and issues related to healthcare systems and providers) emerged. In urban‐rural comparison studies, rural residents were generally less knowledgeable about the neurological disease and more stigmatised. The impact of other factors (i.e., gender, age, and education) on stigma varied and are stated where associations were reported. Three main gaps were identified including: low attention to stigma related to neurological diseases other than epilepsy, limited cross‐cultural comparisons of stigma related to neurological disease, and inclusion of gender as a variable in the analysis of stigma‐related outcomes in only half of the reviewed studies. Further research is recommended.