Sexism and racism perceptions: It depends on who does it and why. (26th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bastart, Jennifer; Branscombe, Nyla R.; Sarda, Elisa; Delmas, Florian
• Is Part Of: European journal of social psychology. Volume 51:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 54
• Page End: 67
• Publication Date: 2021-01-26
• Subjects: Social psychology -- Periodicals; 302
• DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2713
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0046-2772

Abstract

Abstract: Outgroup perpetrators of discrimination are perceived as more biased than ingroup perpetrators, potentially because perpetrator group membership drives inferences regarding their motivation to discriminate. Consequently, when outgroup perpetrators provide hostile justification, greater discrimination and illegitimacy will be perceived compared to when ingroup perpetrators do so. In contrast, benevolent justifications reduce differences in discrimination and illegitimacy perception for outgroup versus ingroup perpetrators. In two experiments ( N s = 243; 382) dealing with sexism and racism, results supported our reasoning that the perpetrator's explicit justification moderates the influence of the perpetrator's group membership on discrimination and illegitimacy perception. Results of a third experiment ( N = 489) show that when no justifications are provided, the prototype effect on discrimination perception mirrors the prototype effect under hostile justification, but not under benevolent justification. The results are more mixed concerning perceived illegitimacy. We discuss the implications of these findings regarding the processes underlying the prototype effect.