Observational versus antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated diverticulitis: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Issue 8 (19th February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Observational versus antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated diverticulitis: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Issue 8 (19th February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Observational versus antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated diverticulitis: an individual-patient data meta-analysis
- Authors:
- van Dijk, S T
Chabok, A
Dijkgraaf, M G
Boermeester, M A
Smedh, K - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Two RCTs (AVOD and DIABOLO) demonstrated no difference in recovery or adverse outcomes when antibiotics for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis were omitted. Both trials showed non-significantly higher rates of complicated diverticulitis and surgery in the non-antibiotic groups. This meta-analysis of individual-patient data aimed to explore adverse outcomes and identify patients at risk who may benefit from antibiotic treatment. Methods: Individual-patient data from those with uncomplicated diverticulitis from two RCTs were pooled. Risk factors for adverse outcomes and the effect of observational management were assessed using logistic regression analyses. P < 0·025 was considered statistically significant owing to multiple testing adjustment. Results: In total, 545 patients in the observational group and 564 in the antibiotics group were included. No statistical differences were found in 1-year follow-up rates of ongoing diverticulitis (7·2 versus 5·0 per cent in observation versus antibiotics groups respectively; P = 0·062), recurrent diverticulitis (8·6 versus 9·6 per cent; P = 0·610), complicated diverticulitis (4·0 versus 2·1 per cent; P = 0·079) and sigmoid resection (5·0 versus 2·5 per cent; P = 0·214). An initial pain score greater than 7, white blood cell count exceeding 13·5 × 10 9 /l and previous diverticulitis at presentation were risk factors for adverse outcomes. Antibiotic treatment did not prevent adverse outcomes in patients at high riskAbstract: Background: Two RCTs (AVOD and DIABOLO) demonstrated no difference in recovery or adverse outcomes when antibiotics for acute uncomplicated diverticulitis were omitted. Both trials showed non-significantly higher rates of complicated diverticulitis and surgery in the non-antibiotic groups. This meta-analysis of individual-patient data aimed to explore adverse outcomes and identify patients at risk who may benefit from antibiotic treatment. Methods: Individual-patient data from those with uncomplicated diverticulitis from two RCTs were pooled. Risk factors for adverse outcomes and the effect of observational management were assessed using logistic regression analyses. P < 0·025 was considered statistically significant owing to multiple testing adjustment. Results: In total, 545 patients in the observational group and 564 in the antibiotics group were included. No statistical differences were found in 1-year follow-up rates of ongoing diverticulitis (7·2 versus 5·0 per cent in observation versus antibiotics groups respectively; P = 0·062), recurrent diverticulitis (8·6 versus 9·6 per cent; P = 0·610), complicated diverticulitis (4·0 versus 2·1 per cent; P = 0·079) and sigmoid resection (5·0 versus 2·5 per cent; P = 0·214). An initial pain score greater than 7, white blood cell count exceeding 13·5 × 10 9 /l and previous diverticulitis at presentation were risk factors for adverse outcomes. Antibiotic treatment did not prevent adverse outcomes in patients at high risk of adverse events. Conclusion: Observational management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe. Some statistical uncertainty remains, depending on the thresholds of clinical relevance, owing to small differences, but no subgroup that would benefit from antibiotic treatment was apparent. Graphical Abstract: This individual-patient data meta-analysis of two RCTs, including 1109 patients, showed that non-antibiotic management of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is safe, given the comparable rates of adverse events up to 1 year compared with routine antibiotic treatment. Some statistical uncertainty may remain depending on thresholds of clinical relevance as the sample size of the meta-analysis was insufficient to detect small differences. However, no patient subgroup could be identified that could potentially benefit from antibiotic treatment. Antibiotics not needed … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 107:Issue 8(2020)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 107:Issue 8(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 107, Issue 8 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 107
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0107-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1062
- Page End:
- 1069
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02-19
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.11465 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16235.xml