Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 h of colorectal resection. Issue 5 (7th January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 h of colorectal resection. Issue 5 (7th January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Identification of patients eligible for discharge within 48 h of colorectal resection
- Authors:
- Grass, F
Hübner, M
Mathis, K L
Hahnloser, D
Dozois, E J
Kelley, S R
Demartines, N
Larson, D W - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: This study aimed to identify patients eligible for a 48-h stay after colorectal resection, to provide guidance for early discharge planning. Methods: A bi-institutional retrospective cohort study was undertaken of consecutive patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection for benign or malignant pathology within a comprehensive enhanced recovery pathway between 2011 and 2017. Overall and severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIb or above) postoperative complication and readmission rates were compared between patients who were discharged within 48 h and those who had hospital stay of 48 h or more. Multinominal logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain significant factors associated with a short hospital stay (less than 48 h). Results: In total, 686 of 5122 patients (13·4 per cent) were discharged within 48 h. Independent factors favouring a short hospital stay were age below 60 years (odds ratio (OR) 1·34; P = 0·002), ASA grade less than III (OR 1·42; P = 0·003), restrictive fluid management (less than 3000 ml on day of surgery: OR 1·46; P < 0·001), duration of surgery less than 180 min (OR 1·89; P < 0·001), minimally invasive approach (OR 1·92; P < 0·001) and wound contamination grade below III (OR 4·50; P < 0·001), whereas cancer diagnosis (OR 0·55; P < 0·001) and malnutrition (BMI below 18 kg/m 2 : OR 0·42; P = 0·008) decreased the likelihood of early discharge. Patients with a 48-h stay had fewer overall (10·8 per cent versus 30·6Abstract: Background: This study aimed to identify patients eligible for a 48-h stay after colorectal resection, to provide guidance for early discharge planning. Methods: A bi-institutional retrospective cohort study was undertaken of consecutive patients undergoing major elective colorectal resection for benign or malignant pathology within a comprehensive enhanced recovery pathway between 2011 and 2017. Overall and severe (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIb or above) postoperative complication and readmission rates were compared between patients who were discharged within 48 h and those who had hospital stay of 48 h or more. Multinominal logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain significant factors associated with a short hospital stay (less than 48 h). Results: In total, 686 of 5122 patients (13·4 per cent) were discharged within 48 h. Independent factors favouring a short hospital stay were age below 60 years (odds ratio (OR) 1·34; P = 0·002), ASA grade less than III (OR 1·42; P = 0·003), restrictive fluid management (less than 3000 ml on day of surgery: OR 1·46; P < 0·001), duration of surgery less than 180 min (OR 1·89; P < 0·001), minimally invasive approach (OR 1·92; P < 0·001) and wound contamination grade below III (OR 4·50; P < 0·001), whereas cancer diagnosis (OR 0·55; P < 0·001) and malnutrition (BMI below 18 kg/m 2 : OR 0·42; P = 0·008) decreased the likelihood of early discharge. Patients with a 48-h stay had fewer overall (10·8 per cent versus 30·6 per cent in those with a longer stay; P < 0·001) and fewer severe (2·6 versus 10·2 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) complications, and a lower readmission rate (9·0 versus 11·8 per cent; P = 0·035). Conclusion: Early discharge of selected patients is safe and does not increase postoperative morbidity or readmission rates. In these patients, outpatient colorectal surgery should be feasible on a large scale with logistical optimization. Graphical Abstract: Early discharge within 48 h of colorectal resections is safe in selected patients and does not increase postoperative morbidity or readmission rates. In these patients, outpatient colorectal surgery should be feasible on a large scale with logistical optimization. Safe in some … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 107:Issue 5(2020)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 107:Issue 5(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 107, Issue 5 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 107
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0107-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 546
- Page End:
- 551
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01-07
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.11399 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16234.xml