Health gains, costs and cost-effectiveness of a population-based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Issue 8 (22nd May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Health gains, costs and cost-effectiveness of a population-based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Issue 8 (22nd May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Health gains, costs and cost-effectiveness of a population-based screening programme for abdominal aortic aneurysms
- Authors:
- Nair, N
Kvizhinadze, G
Jones, G T
Rush, R
Khashram, M
Roake, J
Blakely, A - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture carries a high fatality rate. AAAs can be detected before rupture by abdominal ultrasound imaging, allowing elective repair. Population-based screening for AAA in older men reduces AAA-related mortality by about 40 per cent. The UK began an AAA screening programme offering one-off scans to men aged 65 years in 2009. Sweden has a similar programme. Currently, there is no AAA screening programme in New Zealand. This cost–utility analysis aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a UK-style screening programme in the New Zealand setting. Methods: The analysis compared a formal AAA screening programme (one-off abdominal ultrasound imaging for about 20 000 men aged 65 years in 2011) with no systematic screening. A Markov macrosimulation model was adapted to estimate the health gains (in quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs), health system costs and cost-effectiveness in New Zealand. A health system perspective and lifetime horizon was adopted. Results: With New Zealand-specific inputs, the adapted model produced an estimate of about NZ $15 300 (€7746) per QALY gained, with a 95 per cent uncertainty interval (UI) of NZ $8700 to 31 000 (€4405 to 15 694) per QALY gained. Health gains were estimated at 117 (95 per cent UI 53 to 212) QALYs. Health system costs were NZ $1·68 million (€850 535), with a 95 per cent UI of NZ $820 200 to 3·24 million (€415 243 to €1·65 million). Conclusion: Using New Zealand's gross domesticAbstract: Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture carries a high fatality rate. AAAs can be detected before rupture by abdominal ultrasound imaging, allowing elective repair. Population-based screening for AAA in older men reduces AAA-related mortality by about 40 per cent. The UK began an AAA screening programme offering one-off scans to men aged 65 years in 2009. Sweden has a similar programme. Currently, there is no AAA screening programme in New Zealand. This cost–utility analysis aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a UK-style screening programme in the New Zealand setting. Methods: The analysis compared a formal AAA screening programme (one-off abdominal ultrasound imaging for about 20 000 men aged 65 years in 2011) with no systematic screening. A Markov macrosimulation model was adapted to estimate the health gains (in quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs), health system costs and cost-effectiveness in New Zealand. A health system perspective and lifetime horizon was adopted. Results: With New Zealand-specific inputs, the adapted model produced an estimate of about NZ $15 300 (€7746) per QALY gained, with a 95 per cent uncertainty interval (UI) of NZ $8700 to 31 000 (€4405 to 15 694) per QALY gained. Health gains were estimated at 117 (95 per cent UI 53 to 212) QALYs. Health system costs were NZ $1·68 million (€850 535), with a 95 per cent UI of NZ $820 200 to 3·24 million (€415 243 to €1·65 million). Conclusion: Using New Zealand's gross domestic product per capita (about NZ $45 000 or €22 100) as a cost-effectiveness threshold, a UK-style AAA screening programme would be cost-effective in New Zealand. Graphical Abstract: Currently, there is no abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme in New Zealand. This cost–utility analysis aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a UK-style screening programme in the New Zealand setting. With New Zealand-specific inputs, the adapted model produced an estimate of about NZ $15 300 per QALY gained (€7746), with a 95 per cent uncertainty interval of NZ $8700 to 31 000 (€4405 to 15 694). Using New Zealand's gross domestic product per capita (about NZ $45 000 or £22 100) as a cost-effectiveness threshold, a UK-style AAA screening programme would be cost-effective in New Zealand. Cost-effective in New Zealand too … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 106:Issue 8(2019)
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 106:Issue 8(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 106, Issue 8 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 106
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0106-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1043
- Page End:
- 1054
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05-22
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/bjs.11169 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16237.xml