Economically viable CO2 electroreduction embedded within ethylene oxide manufacturing. Issue 3 (15th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barecka, Magda H.; Ager, Joel W.; Lapkin, Alexei A.
• Is Part Of: Energy & environmental science. Volume 14:Issue 3(2021)
• Page Start: 1530
• Page End: 1543
• Publication Date: 2021-02-15
• Subjects: Energy conversion -- Periodicals; Fuel switching -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environmental chemistry -- Periodicals; 333.79
• DOI: 10.1039/d0ee03310c
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1754-5692

Abstract

Abstract : Integration of CO2 electroreduction into ethylene oxide plants significantly reduces CO2 emissions and is economically viable in the short term. Abstract : Electrochemical conversion of CO2 (CO2R) into fuels and chemicals can both reduce CO2 emissions and allow for clean manufacturing in the scenario of significant expansion of renewable power generation. However, large-scale process deployment is currently limited by unfavourable process economics resulting from significant up- and down-stream costs for obtaining pure CO2, separation of reaction products and increased logistical effort. We have discovered a method for economically viable recycling of waste CO2 that addresses these challenges. Our approach is based on integration of a CO2R unit into an existing manufacturing process: ethylene oxide (EO) production, which emits CO2 as a by-product. The standard EO process separates waste CO2 from the gas stream, hence the substrate for electroreduction is available at an EO plant at no additional cost. CO2 can be converted into an ethylene-rich stream and recycled on-site back to the EO reactor, which uses ethylene as a raw material, and also the anode product (oxygen) can be simultaneously valorized for the EO production reaction. If powered by a renewable electricity source, the process will significantly ( ca. 80%) reduce the CO2 emissions of an EO manufacturing plant. A sensitivity analysis shows that the recycling approach can be economically viable in the short term and that its payback time could be as low as 1–2 years in the regions with higher carbon taxes and/or with access to low-cost electricity sources.