An intervention to improve coping strategies in adult male prisoners with a history of traumatic brain injury: A pilot randomised clinical trial. (August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Tracey; du Preez, Elizabeth; Theadom, Alice
• Is Part Of: Clinical rehabilitation. Volume 35:Number 8(2021)
• Page Start: 1185
• Page End: 1195
• Publication Date: 2021-08
• Subjects: Traumatic brain injury -- prison -- cognitive behaviour therapy -- rehabilitation -- mindfulness; Medical rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 617.03
• DOI: 10.1177/0269215521998535
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-2155

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a psychological intervention improves coping, post-concussion symptoms and decreases in-prison infractions in adult males with a history of traumatic brain injury. Design: A single centre, randomised, wait-list, pilot study. Setting: A high security prison in New Zealand. Subjects: Fifty-five adult male participants who had experienced at least one traumatic brain injury in their lifetime (mean age 37.29 +/−9.81 years). Intervention: A manualised ten session, in-person, group based combined Cognitive Behavioural Therapy /Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction intervention versus wait list control. Main measures: The Negative Affect Repair Questionnaire and Rivermead Post-concussion Symptom Questionnaire were completed at baseline, post-intervention (five weeks) and at 12 week follow up. In-prison misconduct charges and negative file notes were reviewed for the previous five weeks at each assessment time point. Results: There was an improvement in the use of calming and distraction strategies in the intervention group from baseline ( x̄ = 17.38, SD = 3.57) to post-intervention ( x̄ = 18.67, SD = 3.84) and 12-week follow up ( x̄ = 18.13, SD = 2.63). Participants in the intervention group had significantly higher negative affect repair on the calming and distractive strategies subscale following completion of the intervention, compared to wait-list controls ( F = 4.69, P = 0.04) with a moderate effect size (ηp 2 = 0.11). Improvements in use of calming and distractive strategies was not sustained at the twelve-week follow-up ( F = 0.87, P = 0.36). There was no-significant improvement on other negative affect subscales or for post-concussion symptoms or decrease in-prison infractions. Conclusion: A manualised psychological intervention may have the potential to facilitate the development of positive coping strategies in prisoners with a history of traumatic brain injury.