Stepping back from the brink: Why multilateral regulation of autonomy in weapons systems is difficult, yet imperative and feasible. (April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sauer, Frank
• Is Part Of: International review of the Red Cross. Volume 102:Number 913(2020)
• Page Start: 235
• Page End: 259
• Publication Date: 2020-04
• Subjects: artificial intelligence, -- lethal autonomous weapons systems, -- arms control winter, -- regulation, -- Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, -- strategic stability, -- human dignity; Red Cross and Red Crescent -- Periodicals; Humanitarian law -- Periodicals; Humanitarianism -- Periodicals; 361.772
• DOI: 10.1017/S1816383120000466
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1816-3831

Abstract

Abstract: This article explains why regulating autonomy in weapons systems, entailing the codification of a legally binding obligation to retain meaningful human control over the use of force, is such a challenging task within the framework of the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. It is difficult because it requires new diplomatic language, and because the military value of weapon autonomy is hard to forego in the current arms control winter. The article argues that regulation is nevertheless imperative, because the strategic as well as ethical risks outweigh the military benefits of unshackled weapon autonomy. To this end, it offers some thoughts on how the implementation of regulation can be expedited.