Variation of Shear Wave Elastography With Preload in the Thyroid: Quantitative Validation. (20th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ozturk, Arinc; Zubajlo, Rebecca E.; Dhyani, Manish; Grajo, Joseph R.; Mercaldo, Nathaniel; Anthony, Brian W.; Samir, Anthony E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of ultrasound in medicine. Volume 40:Number 4(2021)
• Page Start: 779
• Page End: 786
• Publication Date: 2020-09-20
• Subjects: preload force -- quantitative ultrasound -- shear wave elastography -- thyroid nodule -- transducer augmentation; Ultrasonics in medicine -- Periodicals; Ultrasonics; Ultrasonography; Ultrasonics in medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; 616.07543
• DOI: 10.1002/jum.15456
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0278-4297

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Thyroid shear wave elastography (SWE) has been shown to have advantages compared to biopsy or other imaging modalities in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, studies show variability in its assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether stiffness measurements of the normal thyroid, as estimated by SWE, varied due to preload force or the pressure applied between the transducer and the patient. Methods: In this study, a measurement system was attached to the ultrasound transducer to measure the applied load. Shear wave elastographic measurements were obtained from the left lobe of the thyroid at applied transducer forces between 2 and 10 N. A linear mixed‐effects model was constructed to quantify the association between the preload force and stiffness while accounting for correlations between repeated measurements within each participant. The preload force effect on elasticity was modeled by both linear and quadratic terms to account for a possible nonlinear association between these variables. Results: Nineteen healthy volunteers without known thyroid disease participated in the study. The participants had a mean age ± SD of 36 ± 8 years; 74% were female; 74% had a normal body mass index; and 95% were white non‐Hispanic/Latino. The estimated elastographic value at a 2‐N preload force was 16.7 kPa (95% confidence interval, 14.1–19.3 kPa), whereas the value at 10 N was 29.9 kPa (95% confidence interval, 24.9–34.9 kPa). Conclusions: The preload force was significantly and nonlinearly associated with SWE estimates of thyroid stiffness. Quantitative standardization of preload forces in the assessment of thyroid nodules using elastography is an integral factor for improving the accuracy of thyroid nodule evaluation.