Application of eDNA metabarcoding in a fragmented lowland river: Spatial and methodological comparison of fish species composition. Issue 2 (14th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Antognazza, Caterina M.; Britton, Robert J.; Read, Daniel S.; Goodall, Tim; Mantzouratou, Anna; De Santis, Vanessa; Davies, Peter; Aprahamian, Miran; Franklin, Elizabeth; Hardouin, Emilie A.; Andreou, Demetra
• Is Part Of: Environmental DNA. Volume 3:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 458
• Page End: 471
• Publication Date: 2020-09-14
• Subjects: eDNA -- fish monitoring -- habit fragmentation -- lotic system -- metabarcoding -- river; DNA -- Periodicals; Biology -- Periodicals; Microbial ecology -- Periodicals; Biology; DNA; Microbial ecology; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 572.86
• DOI: 10.1002/edn3.136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2637-4943

Abstract

Abstract: Assessments of fish communities tend to rely on capture‐based methods that, due to sampling biases, can underestimate actual species richness. Alternatively, environmental DNA (eDNA) based metabarcoding is a noncapture approach that infers species richness and distribution by collecting and sequencing DNA present in the ecosystem. Here, eDNA metabarcoding was applied to the lower River Severn, a highly modified and impounded river, to identify the species present in the fish assemblage. Using a universal primer for fish (12S mtDNA region), comparisons were made between the species identified as present by eDNA metabarcoding versus long‐term data available from fisheries monitoring data based on capture methods. Depending on the stringency of detection thresholds applied, the two methods detected between 15 and 25 fish species present in the river, with the eDNA metabarcoding detecting most species previously reported in the capture surveys, although with differences in the relative abundance of species between the methods. Notably, eDNA metabarcoding detected species of high conservation importance that were never sampled by capture techniques, including native European shads ( Alosa spp.). Differences in the similarity indices of species detection were greater between the sampling methods than between sampling sites on each river. These results highlight the high potential of eDNA metabarcoding to provide an effective monitoring tool for biodiversity and conservation in rivers, but also indicate the need for complementary multi‐method sampling for robust estimates of fish species richness. Abstract : In this study, an eDNA‐based metabarcoding was applied to the lower River Severn, a highly modified and impounded river, to identify the species present in the fish assemblage. Our results highlight the high potential of eDNA metabarcoding to provide an effective monitoring tool for biodiversity and conservation, but also indicate the need for complementary multi‐method sampling for determining robust estimates of fish species richness.