Palbociclib and cetuximab compared with placebo and cetuximab in platinum-resistant, cetuximab-naïve, human papillomavirus-unrelated recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial. (April 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Palbociclib and cetuximab compared with placebo and cetuximab in platinum-resistant, cetuximab-naïve, human papillomavirus-unrelated recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial. (April 2021)
- Main Title:
- Palbociclib and cetuximab compared with placebo and cetuximab in platinum-resistant, cetuximab-naïve, human papillomavirus-unrelated recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial
- Authors:
- Adkins, Douglas R.
Lin, Jin-Ching
Sacco, Assuntina
Ley, Jessica
Oppelt, Peter
Vanchenko, Vyacheslay
Komashko, Nataliia
Yen, Chia-Jui.
Wise-Draper, Trisha
Lopez-Picazo Gonzalez, Jose
Radulovic, Sinisa
Shen, Qi
Thurm, Holger
Martini, Jean-François
Hoffman, Justin
Huang, Xin
Melichar, Bohuslav
Tahara, Makoto - Abstract:
- Highlights: Median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months with palbociclib (PAL)+cetuximab (CET). Median OS was 7.8 months with placebo (PBO)+CET (HR = 0.82, P = 80.18 vs PAL+CET). OS was longer than expected in the PBO+CET group. Treatment-related adverse events were more common in the PAL+CET group. Abstract: Objectives: This study examined whether palbociclib and cetuximab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo and cetuximab. Materials and methods: In this double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial (PALATINUS), patients with platinum-resistant, cetuximab-naïve, human papillomavirus-unrelated recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma received cetuximab and either palbociclib (arm A) or placebo (arm B). The primary endpoint was OS; 120 patients were required to have ≥80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 (median OS of 10 months in arm A and 6 months in arm B) using a one-sided, log-rank test ( P = 0.10). Results: 125 patients were randomized (arm A: 65, arm B: 60). Median follow-up was 15.9 months (IQR, 11.3–22.7). Median OS was 9.7 months in arm A and 7.8 months in arm B (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54–1.25; P = 0.18). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months in arm A and 4.6 months in arm B (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.67–1.5; P = 0.50). The most common treatment-related adverse events in arm A were rash (39 patients, 60.9%) and neutropenia (26, 40.6%; three febrile) and in arm B was rash (32, 53.3%). Conclusion: There was no significant differenceHighlights: Median overall survival (OS) was 9.7 months with palbociclib (PAL)+cetuximab (CET). Median OS was 7.8 months with placebo (PBO)+CET (HR = 0.82, P = 80.18 vs PAL+CET). OS was longer than expected in the PBO+CET group. Treatment-related adverse events were more common in the PAL+CET group. Abstract: Objectives: This study examined whether palbociclib and cetuximab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus placebo and cetuximab. Materials and methods: In this double-blind, randomized, phase 2 trial (PALATINUS), patients with platinum-resistant, cetuximab-naïve, human papillomavirus-unrelated recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma received cetuximab and either palbociclib (arm A) or placebo (arm B). The primary endpoint was OS; 120 patients were required to have ≥80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 (median OS of 10 months in arm A and 6 months in arm B) using a one-sided, log-rank test ( P = 0.10). Results: 125 patients were randomized (arm A: 65, arm B: 60). Median follow-up was 15.9 months (IQR, 11.3–22.7). Median OS was 9.7 months in arm A and 7.8 months in arm B (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.54–1.25; P = 0.18). Median progression-free survival was 3.9 months in arm A and 4.6 months in arm B (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.67–1.5; P = 0.50). The most common treatment-related adverse events in arm A were rash (39 patients, 60.9%) and neutropenia (26, 40.6%; three febrile) and in arm B was rash (32, 53.3%). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in median OS with palbociclib and cetuximab versus placebo and cetuximab. Funding: Pfizer Inc (NCT02499120). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Oral oncology. Volume 115(2021)
- Journal:
- Oral oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 115(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 115, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 115
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0115-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-04
- Subjects:
- Cetuximab -- Head and neck cancer -- Palbociclib -- Squamous cell carcinoma
Mouth -- Cancer -- Periodicals
Mouth -- Tumors -- Periodicals
Mouth Diseases -- Periodicals
Mouth Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Bouche -- Cancer -- Périodiques
Bouche -- Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9943105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13688375 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/13688375 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105192 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1368-8375
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6277.592000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 16112.xml